AURETA005 - Analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
Assessor Resource
AURETA005 Analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
Assessment tool
Version 1.0 Issue Date: May 2024
This unit describes the performance outcomes required to analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in the embedded network theft-deterrent systems of vehicles or machinery in order to initiate action to sustain, vary or enhance performance. It involves identifying, evaluating, selecting, justifying and documenting the most appropriate rectification method or variation to the rectification method. The unit includes the analysis of multi-system and intermittent faults which may be caused by operating in adverse conditions.
It applies to those working in the automotive service and repair industry on network theft-deterrent systems of vehicles or machinery.
No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
You may want to include more information here about the target group and the purpose of the assessments (eg formative, summative, recognition)
Evidence Required
List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements
Elements describe the essential outcomes.
Performance Criteria
Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold and italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section.
1. Identify and confirm the work requirement
1.1 Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
1.2 Specifications for embedded network theft-deterrent system are sourced and interpreted
1.3 System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
1.4 Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures and safety requirements
2. Prepare for analysis and evaluation
2.1 Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
2.2 Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
2.3 Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
2.4 Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
2.5 Theft-deterrent system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
3. Carry out failure analysis
3.1 Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
3.2 Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
3.3 Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
3.4 Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
3.5 Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements
4. Make recommendations
4.1 Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
4.2 Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
4.3 Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
5. Complete work processes
5.1 Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
5.2 Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
5.3 Tools and equipment are checked and stored, and any faulty electrical equipment is identified, tagged and isolated according to workplace procedures
5.4 Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
Before competency can be determined, individuals must demonstrate they can perform the following according to the standards defined in this unit’s elements, performance criteria, range of conditions and foundation skills:
analyse and evaluate an electrical or electronic fault in the embedded network theft-deterrent systems of two different vehicles or machinery
the above faults must involve two of the following systems:
locking and securing
passive entry
integrated alarm
engine immobiliser
remote access.
Individuals must be able to demonstrate knowledge of:
work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements relating to analysing and evaluating faults in theft-deterrent systems, including procedures for identifying hazards and controlling risks associated with wearing jewellery while working around high current wiring systems
principles and processes involved in planning and implementing analysis and evaluation of electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
design and planning of diagnostic procedures for faults in theft-deterrent systems, including procedures for diagnosing:
electrical faults
electronic faults
types, functions, operation and limitations of theft-deterrent systems, including:
gateway network control module
bus network topography
body control module (BCM) functions
associated embedded network theft-deterrent system components
sensor and actuator control and monitoring systems
control signal circuits
testing procedures for theft-deterrent systems, including the use of:
digital multimeter
scan tool
oscilloscope
types, functions, operation and limitations of diagnostic testing equipment required to analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
procedures for accessing and interpreting scan tool system data, including:
diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs), including:
conditions that set the DTCs
conditions for running DTCs
live data
freeze frame data
waveforms
procedures for documenting and reporting the analysis and evaluation process
requirements of Australian Design Rules (ADRs) relating to theft-deterrent systems.
Assessors must satisfy NVR/AQTF assessor requirements.
Competency is to be assessed in the workplace or a simulated environment that accurately reflects performance in a real workplace setting.
Assessment must include direct observation of tasks.
Where assessment of competency includes third-party evidence, individuals must provide evidence that links them to the theft-deterrent systems that they have worked on, e.g. repair orders.
Assessors must verify performance evidence through questioning on skills and knowledge to ensure correct interpretation and application.
The following resources must be made available:
automotive repair workplace or simulated workplace
workplace instructions
manufacturer theft-deterrent system specifications
two different vehicles or machinery with faults in the theft-deterrent systems specified in the performance evidence
diagnostic equipment for theft-deterrent system fault diagnosis, including:
digital multimeter
scan tool
oscilloscope
tools, equipment and materials appropriate for analysing and evaluating theft-deterrent systems.
Submission Requirements
List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assingnment, checklist) and due date here
Assessment task 1: [title] Due date:
(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)
Assessment Tasks
Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.
Elements
Elements describe the essential outcomes.
Performance Criteria
Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold and italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section.
1. Identify and confirm the work requirement
1.1 Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
1.2 Specifications for embedded network theft-deterrent system are sourced and interpreted
1.3 System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
1.4 Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures and safety requirements
2. Prepare for analysis and evaluation
2.1 Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
2.2 Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
2.3 Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
2.4 Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
2.5 Theft-deterrent system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
3. Carry out failure analysis
3.1 Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
3.2 Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
3.3 Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
3.4 Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
3.5 Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements
4. Make recommendations
4.1 Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
4.2 Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
4.3 Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
5. Complete work processes
5.1 Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
5.2 Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
5.3 Tools and equipment are checked and stored, and any faulty electrical equipment is identified, tagged and isolated according to workplace procedures
5.4 Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
This section specifies work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below.
Safety requirements must include:
work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements, including procedures for identifying hazards and controlling risks associated with wearing jewellery while working around high current wiring systems.
Analytical and evaluative methodology must include:
diagnostic process, sequence, tests and testing equipment.
Before competency can be determined, individuals must demonstrate they can perform the following according to the standards defined in this unit’s elements, performance criteria, range of conditions and foundation skills:
analyse and evaluate an electrical or electronic fault in the embedded network theft-deterrent systems of two different vehicles or machinery
the above faults must involve two of the following systems:
locking and securing
passive entry
integrated alarm
engine immobiliser
remote access.
Individuals must be able to demonstrate knowledge of:
work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements relating to analysing and evaluating faults in theft-deterrent systems, including procedures for identifying hazards and controlling risks associated with wearing jewellery while working around high current wiring systems
principles and processes involved in planning and implementing analysis and evaluation of electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
design and planning of diagnostic procedures for faults in theft-deterrent systems, including procedures for diagnosing:
electrical faults
electronic faults
types, functions, operation and limitations of theft-deterrent systems, including:
gateway network control module
bus network topography
body control module (BCM) functions
associated embedded network theft-deterrent system components
sensor and actuator control and monitoring systems
control signal circuits
testing procedures for theft-deterrent systems, including the use of:
digital multimeter
scan tool
oscilloscope
types, functions, operation and limitations of diagnostic testing equipment required to analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
procedures for accessing and interpreting scan tool system data, including:
diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs), including:
conditions that set the DTCs
conditions for running DTCs
live data
freeze frame data
waveforms
procedures for documenting and reporting the analysis and evaluation process
requirements of Australian Design Rules (ADRs) relating to theft-deterrent systems.
Assessors must satisfy NVR/AQTF assessor requirements.
Competency is to be assessed in the workplace or a simulated environment that accurately reflects performance in a real workplace setting.
Assessment must include direct observation of tasks.
Where assessment of competency includes third-party evidence, individuals must provide evidence that links them to the theft-deterrent systems that they have worked on, e.g. repair orders.
Assessors must verify performance evidence through questioning on skills and knowledge to ensure correct interpretation and application.
The following resources must be made available:
automotive repair workplace or simulated workplace
workplace instructions
manufacturer theft-deterrent system specifications
two different vehicles or machinery with faults in the theft-deterrent systems specified in the performance evidence
diagnostic equipment for theft-deterrent system fault diagnosis, including:
digital multimeter
scan tool
oscilloscope
tools, equipment and materials appropriate for analysing and evaluating theft-deterrent systems.
Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.
Observation Checklist
Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice
Yes
No
Comments/feedback
Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
Specifications for embedded network theft-deterrent system are sourced and interpreted
System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures and safety requirements
Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
Theft-deterrent system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements
Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
Tools and equipment are checked and stored, and any faulty electrical equipment is identified, tagged and isolated according to workplace procedures
Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
Specifications for embedded network theft-deterrent system are sourced and interpreted
System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures and safety requirements
Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
Theft-deterrent system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements
Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
Tools and equipment are checked and stored, and any faulty electrical equipment is identified, tagged and isolated according to workplace procedures
Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
Forms
Assessment Cover Sheet
AURETA005 - Analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
Assessment task 1: [title]
Student name:
Student ID:
I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.
Student signature:
Result: Competent Not yet competent
Feedback to student
Assessor name:
Signature:
Date:
Assessment Record Sheet
AURETA005 - Analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in theft-deterrent systems
Student name:
Student ID:
Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent
(add lines for each task)
Feedback to student:
Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent