Assessor Resource

CPPHSA5005
Peer review NatHERS assessments

Assessment tool

Version 1.0
Issue Date: April 2024


This unit of competency specifies the outcomes required to participate in individual or panel peer review processes that are designed to ensure the quality and consistency of Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) assessments. It includes preparing for the peer review, conducting the peer review, recording and reporting the outcomes of the review, and evaluating the review process.

The unit supports the work of NatHERS assessors engaged in peer review processes.

In some jurisdictions, this unit of competency may form part of the accreditation, licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements for NatHERS assessors.

You may want to include more information here about the target group and the purpose of the assessments (eg formative, summative, recognition)



Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions.

1.

Prepare to participate in peer review of a NatHERS assessment.

1.1.

Plan for peer review of NatHERS assessment is established.

1.2.

Information to be provided by NatHERS assessor is confirmed.

1.3.

Risks associated with building design assessed by the NatHERS assessor are determined to identify areas of data to be reviewed.

1.4.

Specialist support required for peer review is identified.

2.

Undertake peer review.

2.1.

NatHERS assessment supplied by assessor is evaluated.

2.2.

Supplementary information or clarification of submitted NatHERS assessment is sought, if required.

2.3.

Specialist advice is sought, if required.

2.4.

Professional judgement is applied to evaluate NatHERS assessment based on the available evidence.

2.5.

Peer review decision is made.

2.6.

Outcomes of peer review, including clear and constructive feedback, are communicated to NatHERS assessor.

3.

Record and report outcomes of peer review.

3.1.

Outcomes of peer review are recorded promptly and accurately.

3.2.

Report on peer review is completed and processed.

4.

Evaluate peer review process.

4.1.

Peer review process is evaluated.

4.2.

Outcomes of evaluation of peer review process are documented.

A person demonstrating competency in this unit must satisfy the requirements of the elements, performance criteria, foundation skills and range of conditions of this unit.

The person must also undertake a peer review, on either an individual basis or as part of a panel, of one Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) assessment.

In doing the above, the person must:

prepare for the peer review, including identifying the risks associated with the building design assessed by the NatHERS assessor to determine areas of data to be reviewed

make a professional judgement on a NatHERS assessment during the conduct of the peer review process

provide the outcomes of the peer review process and feedback for the NatHERS assessor

evaluate the peer review process with a view to indicating aspects for future improvement

demonstrate knowledge of organisation’s peer review policy and procedures.

A person demonstrating competency in this unit must demonstrate knowledge of:

National Construction Code (NCC) energy efficiency requirements

NatHERS:

accredited software

administrative and governance arrangements

assessor accreditation

assessor accrediting organisations

regulatory framework

organisation’s quality management system

peer review:

individual and group peer review processes

organisational policies and procedures

principles of assessment

privacy and confidentiality

purpose of peer review

security of information.

The following must be present and available to learners during assessment activities:

equipment:

computer equipment suitable for preparing reports and accessing information relevant to the peer assessment process

materials:

NatHERS reports to be peer reviewed

relevant codes, standards and government regulations

technical reference library with current publications on peer review and the administrative and governance arrangements for NatHERS

relationships with team members and supervisor:

assessment activities are performed on an individual basis under general supervision.

Assessor requirements

As a minimum, assessors must satisfy the assessor requirements in the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) current at the time of assessment.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assingnment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions.

1.

Prepare to participate in peer review of a NatHERS assessment.

1.1.

Plan for peer review of NatHERS assessment is established.

1.2.

Information to be provided by NatHERS assessor is confirmed.

1.3.

Risks associated with building design assessed by the NatHERS assessor are determined to identify areas of data to be reviewed.

1.4.

Specialist support required for peer review is identified.

2.

Undertake peer review.

2.1.

NatHERS assessment supplied by assessor is evaluated.

2.2.

Supplementary information or clarification of submitted NatHERS assessment is sought, if required.

2.3.

Specialist advice is sought, if required.

2.4.

Professional judgement is applied to evaluate NatHERS assessment based on the available evidence.

2.5.

Peer review decision is made.

2.6.

Outcomes of peer review, including clear and constructive feedback, are communicated to NatHERS assessor.

3.

Record and report outcomes of peer review.

3.1.

Outcomes of peer review are recorded promptly and accurately.

3.2.

Report on peer review is completed and processed.

4.

Evaluate peer review process.

4.1.

Peer review process is evaluated.

4.2.

Outcomes of evaluation of peer review process are documented.

This section specifies work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below.

Peer review must include at least one of the following:

group process

individual process.

A person demonstrating competency in this unit must satisfy the requirements of the elements, performance criteria, foundation skills and range of conditions of this unit.

The person must also undertake a peer review, on either an individual basis or as part of a panel, of one Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) assessment.

In doing the above, the person must:

prepare for the peer review, including identifying the risks associated with the building design assessed by the NatHERS assessor to determine areas of data to be reviewed

make a professional judgement on a NatHERS assessment during the conduct of the peer review process

provide the outcomes of the peer review process and feedback for the NatHERS assessor

evaluate the peer review process with a view to indicating aspects for future improvement

demonstrate knowledge of organisation’s peer review policy and procedures.

A person demonstrating competency in this unit must demonstrate knowledge of:

National Construction Code (NCC) energy efficiency requirements

NatHERS:

accredited software

administrative and governance arrangements

assessor accreditation

assessor accrediting organisations

regulatory framework

organisation’s quality management system

peer review:

individual and group peer review processes

organisational policies and procedures

principles of assessment

privacy and confidentiality

purpose of peer review

security of information.

The following must be present and available to learners during assessment activities:

equipment:

computer equipment suitable for preparing reports and accessing information relevant to the peer assessment process

materials:

NatHERS reports to be peer reviewed

relevant codes, standards and government regulations

technical reference library with current publications on peer review and the administrative and governance arrangements for NatHERS

relationships with team members and supervisor:

assessment activities are performed on an individual basis under general supervision.

Assessor requirements

As a minimum, assessors must satisfy the assessor requirements in the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) current at the time of assessment.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Plan for peer review of NatHERS assessment is established. 
Information to be provided by NatHERS assessor is confirmed. 
Risks associated with building design assessed by the NatHERS assessor are determined to identify areas of data to be reviewed. 
Specialist support required for peer review is identified. 
NatHERS assessment supplied by assessor is evaluated. 
Supplementary information or clarification of submitted NatHERS assessment is sought, if required. 
Specialist advice is sought, if required. 
Professional judgement is applied to evaluate NatHERS assessment based on the available evidence. 
Peer review decision is made. 
Outcomes of peer review, including clear and constructive feedback, are communicated to NatHERS assessor. 
Outcomes of peer review are recorded promptly and accurately. 
Report on peer review is completed and processed. 
Peer review process is evaluated. 
Outcomes of evaluation of peer review process are documented. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

CPPHSA5005 - Peer review NatHERS assessments
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

CPPHSA5005 - Peer review NatHERS assessments

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: