List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element |
| |
1 | Check work requirements | 1.1 | Identify work requirements |
| 1.2 | Identify product, materials and equipment requirements for job |
| 1.3 | Identify and control hazards |
| 1.4 | Check with supervisor/appropriate person if requirements are not in accordance with usual practice |
2 | Conduct pre-cutting operations in accordance with procedures | 2.1 | Check raw materials are correct |
| 2.2 | Mark out/lay out job for cutting taking account of directional properties in materials as appropriate |
| 2.3 | Undertake other pre-cutting requirements in accordance with procedures |
3 | Cut to requirements | 3.1 | Cut materials using cutting tools/equipment in accordance with procedures |
| 3.2 | Monitor dimensions, shape, quality and quantity of cuts |
| 3.3 | Collect material which is able to be recycled or reused, separate and dispose of waste and scrap |
4 | Resolve routine problems | 4.1 | Identify likely problems during the operation/task |
| 4.2 | Resolve routine problems in accordance with procedures |
| 4.3 | Take appropriate action on other problems |
| 4.4 | Complete required records in accordance with procedures |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
set up and operate equipment according to procedures
identify hazards and apply relevant hazard controls
monitor equipment operation and product quality
identify and take action on problems in accordance with procedures
cut polymer materials to correct size, shape or pattern
apply known solutions to routine problems
complete workplace forms.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment
potential effects of variations in raw materials and equipment operation in relation to quality of product
factors which may affect product quality or production output and appropriate remedies
directional properties of polymers as relevant to the job
different types of materials and their behaviour when cut
different cutting equipment and suitability for materials
controls of cutting equipment.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operation of an operating plant
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report or other evidence, focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor /third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
will typically include the use of an appropriate industrial item of equipment requiring demonstration of operation and responding to problems
may use industry based simulation for all or part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
As a minimum, assessors must satisfy the Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015 assessor requirements.