List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Determine appropriate analytical techniques | 1.1 | Liaise with key stakeholders to determine objectives of maintenance strategy. |
| 1.2 | Examine current maintenance situation to determine major areas requiring improvement. |
| 1.3 | Compare possible strategies, techniques and tools against organisation needs. |
| 1.4 | Select possible strategies, techniques and tools. |
| 1.5 | Confirm selected strategies, techniques and tools with key stakeholders. |
|
2 | Develop reliability strategies | 2.1 | Select preferred maintenance strategy. |
| 2.2 | Examine and adapt strategy to organisation needs and priorities. |
| 2.3 | Examine and adapt techniques and tools required to implement strategy. |
| 2.4 | Liaise with key stakeholders to develop an implementation plan. |
| 2.5 | Identify key information and performance indicators required. |
|
3 | Implement strategy | 3.1 | Identify data collection required. |
| 3.2 | Identify hardware and other resources required. |
| 3.3 | Identify skill needs required in consultation with key stakeholders. |
| 3.4 | Ensure all resources/training are available. |
| 3.5 | Implement strategy. |
|
4 | Monitor implementation of strategy | 4.1 | Compare information/performance indicators with desired levels. |
| 4.2 | Liaise with key stakeholders regarding strategy issues. |
| 4.3 | Identify areas requiring adjustment. |
| 4.4 | Make required adjustments. |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability, for one (1) or more work areas or product families, to:
consider a variety of proactive maintenance strategies for suitability to an organisation
consult operators, maintenance, management and other stakeholders in decisions on proactive maintenance strategies
implement selected strategies
monitor performance to selected indicators and make improvements to selected proactive maintenance strategies.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to develop and implement a proactive maintenance strategy, including knowledge of:
characteristics and strengths of different types of strategies, techniques and tools
holistic costs of different strategies combining cost of maintenance with costs of lost production, sales, and so on, as relevant to the organisation
business goals sufficient to match the strategy to the business needs
strategic thinking and its application to proactive maintenance
principles of process equipment and how to improve its reliability
resources required and how to obtain them.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project where development of a proactive maintenance strategy occurs in an operational workplace.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR
relevant workplace experience
Currency can be demonstrated through:
performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR
having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.