The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included. |
Competitive systems and practices | Competitive systems and practices may include, but are not limited to: lean operations agile operations preventative and predictive maintenance approaches monitoring and data gathering systems, such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Materials Resource Planning (MRP) and proprietary systems statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma JIT, kanban and other pull-related operations control systems supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis 5S continuous improvement (kaizen) breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz) cause/effect diagrams overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) takt time process mapping problem solving run charts standard procedures current reality tree Competitive systems and practices should be interpreted so as to take into account: the stage of implementation of competitive systems and practices the size of the enterprise the work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and the industry sector |
Change project personnel | Change project personnel include: the decision makers who determine if the proposed change may proceed and the key managers and implementers of the change |
Current state | The current state is ideally defined by existing data. Where this is not available suitable proxies should be sought |
Codes of practice/standards | Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used |
HSE | All changes implemented should be at least neutral, or preferably beneficial, in their impact on HSE |
High level change network | High level change network includes groups involved in the change and who need to be committed to the change and include: sponsors cascading change sponsors targets agents advocates enablers impeders |
Organisation | Organisation includes: any part of a manufacturing or service organisation companies, government bodies or other body of people aiming to produce a product to service a customer |
Key change project personnel | Key change project personnel include: project sponsors cascading sponsors relevant managers change agents |
Project sponsor | Project sponsors include: those people who proposed the project and are its main supporters |
Cascading sponsor | A cascading sponsor refers to: a person who reports to a sponsor and so may be contributing on their behalf A cascading sponsor works with delegated authority and responsibility |
Risks | Risks include: business risks (e.g. over-spending) market risk (e.g. loss of market share) HSE risks relationship risks (e.g. to shareholders, employees, suppliers, customers or the community) |
Organisation capacity | Organisation capacity includes: organisation history of implementing change capability in change implementation adaptability of people to change demand for the change in the part of the organisation |
Risk dimensions | Specific risk dimensions include: impact of the solution (its potential for disruption to production, quality, delivery and budgets) readiness of people to accept the change, including readiness to accept changes in role and responsibilities availability of resources, including financial, plant and equipment, and dedicated personnel |
Transition approach | Transition approach will depend on the nature of the risks determined and will include: transition style (top down/pilot/process focused/ delegated change) degree of sponsorship to be cascaded balance of engagement/involvement internal and/or external resources use of change to build organisation capacity |
High level involvement plans | High level involvement plans aim to create ownership by involving groups in specific activities within defined constraints of: objectives for involvement decision parameters and timing of involvement The specific activities include: problem/opportunity identification solution design implementation/transition planning solution building solution testing solution piloting training design training delivery communication roll out solution roll out |
Alignment plan | Alignment plan ensures alignment and sustainability between: policies, processes and procedures incentives and rewards (KPIs and intended outcomes) consequences and penalties for non-compliance preventing pre-change behaviours and patterns recurring |
Sustaining improvement | Improvement may be sustained by including it in: standard procedures and work instructions standard practice other relevant documents and practices |
Team leader | Team leader may include: any person who may have either a permanent or an ad hoc role in facilitating the function of a team in a workplace |