List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Determine theoretical performance | 1.1 | Identify item of plant and plant component to be analysed |
| 1.2 | Locate and interpret design specification |
| 1.3 | Identify process materials being processed/to be processed during verification trial |
| 1.4 | Determine process material properties under process conditions |
| 1.5 | Calculate theoretical performance of component with that material under those conditions |
|
2 | Conduct trial | 2.1 | Design verification trial to be compatible with theoretical analysis |
| 2.2 | Determine measurements needed from trial to yield required data |
| 2.3 | Select equipment suitable to give required measurements |
| 2.4 | Arrange for verification trial with relevant process personnel |
| 2.5 | Set up required measurement equipment |
| 2.6 | Supervise trial and ensure trial conditions are appropriate |
| 2.7 | Collect trial data for analysis |
|
3 | Verify performance of component | 3.1 | Compare theoretical with actual performance |
| 3.2 | Determine significance of variation between theoretical and actual performance |
| 3.3 | Investigate any suspicious results and take appropriate action |
|
4 | Recommend required action | 4.1 | Determine appropriate action to bring performance to desired level |
| 4.2 | Initiate the corrective action to procedures |
| 4.3 | Determine measures to increase equipment productivity |
| 4.4 | Re-check performance after corrective action is implemented |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
read and interpret test results, technical information, equipment specifications and instruments/control panels
calculate the theoretical performance of the screw or die from design specifications
design and supervise verification trial and gather data to determine the actual performance of the screw or die
calculate actual versus theoretical performance
determine significant variations and investigate suspicious results
determine the 'limiting component' in the performance of an item of equipment or a process
determine possible performance of an item of equipment/process if practical improvements were made to the 'limiting item'
make recommendations as to the appropriate action to be taken based on the performance verification results
record trial results and complete workplace records
calculate and interpret statistics, product formulae and process conditions.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge relevant to their job sufficient to fulfil their job role, including knowledge of:
characteristics and manufacturing behaviours of polymers involved in the process
polymer materials, their additives and the rheological, heat and other effects of processing to the design of equipment and components to predict practical performance results
types of data and techniques for calculation of theoretical and actual performance
organisation procedures relevant to the work environment/job role
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
Where the assessee does not currently possess evidence of competency in PMBTECH40 Predict polymer properties and characteristics and MSMOPS401 Trial new process or product, one or both may be co-assessed with this unit.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from demonstration of skills and one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews.
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment shall demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they shall assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on the job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.