List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
ELEMENTS | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
Elements describe the essential outcomes | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section. |
1. Identify risk | 1.1 Conduct environmental scan to identify risk. 1.2 Consult stakeholders to determine risks and issues. 1.3 Recognise risks as outlined in jurisdictional risk management framework. |
2. Evaluate risk critically | 2.1 Analyse the nature of recognised risks to determine likelihood and consequences. 2.2 Assess risk in line with jurisdictional evaluation criteria. 2.3 Interpret risk assessment to develop mitigation strategies. 2.4 Correlate likelihood and consequence categories to determine vulnerability and priority. |
3. Develop risk treatment strategies | 3.1 Determine options to address risk. 3.2 Critique options while considering good practice and alternatives. 3.3 Evaluate strategies to identify limitations and impacts of strategies. 3.4 Select option(s) for development of a risk treatment strategy. 3.5 Prioritise selected options for implementation purposes. 3.6 Apply risk treatment strategy to identified risk. |
4. Review risk treatment strategies | 4.1 Monitor the implementation of the risk treatment strategy. 4.2 Evaluate effectiveness of the risk treatment strategy. 4.3 Communicate outcomes to stakeholders to support accountability and transparency. |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence must satisfy all of the requirements of the elements and performance criteria. If not otherwise specified the candidate must demonstrate evidence of performance of the following on at least one occasion.
assessing information to identify risks and define problems
applying jurisdictional risk management frameworks to identify and evaluate risks
analysing risk to establish likelihood and consequences
developing, evaluating and communicating risk mitigation strategies
assessing information to develop risk treatment strategies
managing the implementation of risk treatment strategies
communicating with stakeholders
Evidence required to demonstrate competence must satisfy all of the requirements of the elements and performance criteria. If not otherwise specified the depth of knowledge demonstrated must be appropriate to the job context of the candidate.
evaluation strategies
jurisdictional reporting hierarchy and governance structure
jurisdictional risk assessment processes, policies and procedures
jurisdictional quality assurance responsibilities and processes
capabilities, powers and authorities of external services
jurisdictional communication systems
compliance and auditing processes
risk management principles
resources available to respond to risks within policing environments
risk assessment tools
legislative requirements relevant to incident management
problem solving and decision making techniques
risk management concepts, principles and strategies
This unit contains no specific industry-mandated assessment conditions. Guidance on suggested and recommended conditions and methods can be found in the Implementation Guide.
Consideration must be given to holistic assessment for this unit. Refer to advice in the companion volumes.
Assessors must satisfy the NVR/AQTF mandatory competency requirements for assessors.