List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
ELEMENTS | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
Elements describe the essential outcomes | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section. |
1. Conduct fraud and corruption risk assessment | 1.1 Conduct fraud and corruption risk assessment based on understanding of the environment and core business of the organisation. 1.2 Identify and report any gaps in the predetermined methodology and propose options to fill these gaps as required. 1.3 Allow for impacts of possible change in organisational business in the risk assessment. 1.4 Assess validity and reliability of data. 1.5 Use consultation and data matching to identify patterns. 1.6 Apply both qualitative assessment and quantitative representation of risks in the assessment. |
2. Review processes involved in the risk assessment | 2.1 Monitor and review processes in accordance with the objectives of fraud and corruption risk assessment strategy, government policy and risk management standards. 2.2 Provide advice to business sections and other stakeholders regarding issues arising out of fraud and corruption risk assessment. 2.3 Discuss options to overcome identified obstacles with management, affected or relevant staff, and implement agreed options. 2.4 Assess effectiveness of fraud and corruption control strategies, and prepare reports for various audiences. |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence must satisfy all of the requirements of the elements and performance criteria. If not otherwise specified the candidate must demonstrate evidence of performance of the following on at least one occasion.
planning, analysis and evaluation relating to fraud and corruption risk assessment
using communication, consultation and negotiation styles to suit different audiences and purposes
providing advice on complex documents, including legislation, policy and recommendations relating to fraud and corruption risk control
differentiating between the inherent risks and the effectiveness of controls in place
managing contractors if the fraud and corruption risk assessment is outsourced
Evidence required to demonstrate competence must satisfy all of the requirements of the elements and performance criteria. If not otherwise specified the depth of knowledge demonstrated must be appropriate to the job context of the candidate.
fraud and corruption and how they relate to the specific functions and activities of the organisation together with an understanding of ethical standards required by the organisation of its staff, contractors and suppliers
jurisdictional fraud and corruption control requirements
agency fraud and corruption control policy
fraud and corruption risk management methodology
agency structure and core business activities
current fraud and corruption control plan
relationship of the risk methodology to the fraud and corruption control strategy
fraud and corruption risk factors in the organisation
antidiscrimination and diversity legislation
legislation, policies and procedures relating to fraud and corruption risk assessment
Australian and New Zealand standards – AS/NZS 4360:1999 or as revised
This unit contains no specific industry-mandated assessment conditions. Guidance on suggested and recommended conditions and methods can be found in the Implementation Guide.
Assessors must satisfy the NVR/AQTF mandatory competency requirements for assessors.