Google Links

Follow the links below to find material targeted to the unit's elements, performance criteria, required skills and knowledge

Elements and Performance Criteria

  1. Research design theory
  2. Apply theories of design to professional practice
  3. Develop, articulate and debate own perspectives on theories of design

Required Skills

Required skills

communication skills to articulate and debate complex concepts

critical thinking skills to analyse complex information and to develop and substantiate own positions and responses to theories and thinking around design

literacy skills to research information dealing with complex concepts and theories

selfmanagement skills to develop and substantiate own views and ideas

Required knowledge

different theories of design including different historical perspectives and current and emerging thinking

relationship between theories of design and design in practice in a particular work or broader social context

relationships similarities and differences at a conceptual and practical level between the concepts of design innovation and creativity

systemic impacts on design social economic political and environmental

Evidence Required

The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria required skills and knowledge range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Evidence of the following is essential

research into past current and emerging theories of design

development of substantiated positions on design and its application in response to own analysis and research

knowledge of different theories and thinking on design and its application in different social and work contexts

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Assessment must ensure

use of current and emerging sources of information and thinking on design

Method of assessment

A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge The following examples are appropriate for this unit

direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third party workplace reports of onthejob performance by the candidate

evaluation of research undertaken by the candidate into design theory and its application

evaluation of candidates participation in discussion and debate on theories of design

Guidance information for assessment

The design process does not occur in isolation Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector workplace and job role is recommended


Range Statement

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Research techniques may include:

desk research

informal discussions

internet

interviews

literature reviews

New, emerging and alternative sources of ideas and thinking may include:

current business theories

government policy

individual in any field of endeavour

innovative organisations

international trends

Critical analysis may involve:

adapting

analysing and evaluating actions and policies

challenging

clarifying issues, values and standards

comparing analogous situations

comparing and contrasting ideals with practice

comparing and evaluating beliefs, interpretations and theories

developing criteria for evaluation

distinguishing relevant from irrelevant facts

examining and evaluating assumptions

exploring implications and consequences

generating and assessing solutions

debating and discussing

judging

making interdisciplinary connections

making plausible inferences and predictions

noting significant similarities and differences

questioning

reading and listening critically

reflecting

Theoretical perspectives and thinking may be:

economic

environmental

historical

local, national and international

political

social/cultural

Own professional and personal experience may include:

evaluation of contexts in which creativity has flourished

evaluation of different attitudes to design and the role of designers

observations of the ways people interrelate with the design process, of the ways people use and adapt designs in daily life

reflection on current political, social and cultural trends

reflection on own experience with any type design process

workplace experience

Benefits to individuals, businesses and communities may include:

better individual and business relationships

capacity for innovation and invention

greater social cohesion

improved productivity and profit

psychological wellbeing of individuals and communities

Substantiated positions may be positions which are:

grounded in appropriate research

result of rational and logical thought

subjected to the analysis of others

supported by relevant information

Clarity of thought and conceptual understanding may be demonstrated by:

ability to exchange and debate ideas with others

appropriate distillation of ideas to suit the required purpose

audience understanding

clear articulation of ideas