Google Links

Follow the links below to find material targeted to the unit's elements, performance criteria, required skills and knowledge

Elements and Performance Criteria

  1. Identify objectives and scope by research and consultation
  2. Identify and consult with stakeholders
  3. Clarify roles and requirements with stakeholders
  4. Develop risk criteria with stakeholders
  5. Monitor and review

Required Skills

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level required for this unit

Required Skills

stakeholder analysis

communication and consultation in a group context

facilitation of group processes

negotiation

problem solving

project management

research skills to conduct geographic demographic and socioeconomic analysis

Required Knowledge

emergency risk management concepts and principles included in the current National Emergency Risk Assessment Guidelines

legislative and regulatory requirements relevant to emergency risk management

problem solving and decision making techniques

Evidence Required

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Stakeholders are comprehensively identified and consulted to establish a clear context which includes objectives scope and risk criteria

Consistency in performance

Candidates should be expected to present evidence from at least two different contexts one of which may be simulated

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Context of assessment

Evidence of competence in this unit may be collected in a simulated environment and a real environment often as part of a larger project with concurrent assessment of other emergency risk management competencies

Specific resources for assessment

For the demonstration of competence in this unit it will be necessary to participate in a realworld project

Underpinning knowledge may be assessed through written assignments project reports debriefings and action learning projects in real or simulated environments

Guidance information for assessment

This unit contains many transferable skills such as communication consultation research and analysis skills that can be applied in the emergency risk management context Assessors should use formative assessment strategies in a simulated environment to contextualise underpinning knowledge Summative assessment requires application of the unit in a realworld project often in an actionlearning context

This unit may be assessed with other units that address other parts of the emergency risk management process


Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Standards and guidelines may include:

AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009, Risk management—Principles and Guidelines

HB 327:2010, Communicating and consulting about risk

ISO Guide 73:2009, Risk management—Vocabulary

National Emergency, Management Committee (2010), National Emergency Risk Assessment Guidelines

jurisdictional or organisational emergency risk management policies and procedures

Stakeholders may include:

staff

client groups

decision makers

members of the public

community groups

industry groups

public and private sector organisations

non-government organisations

elected officials

Policies and procedures may include:

arrangements specified in legislation

organisational or jurisdictional emergency risk management policies or procedures

existing disaster plans, agreements or memoranda of understanding

Information about communities may include:

demographic measures

socio-economic measures

local economy and industry makeup and interdependencies

cultural makeup and mix

Risk criteria may include:

the nature and types of causes and consequences that can occur and how they will be measured

how likelihood will be defined

the timeframe(s) of the likelihood and/or consequence(s)

how the level of risk is to be determined

the views of stakeholders

the level at which risk becomes acceptable or tolerable

whether combinations of multiple risks should be taken into account and, if so, how and which combinations should be considered

Practical constraints may include:

arrangements, roles and responsibilities set down in existing emergency management plans

availability of technical expertise, technology, equipment

budgets, time, availability and capability of people

land use planning policy, authority and regulation

legislation covering emergency management, environmental management, safety standards, local government regulations

limited community knowledge of emergency risk management processes and benefits

political, social and cultural considerations