Google Links

Follow the links below to find material targeted to the unit's elements, performance criteria, required skills and knowledge

Elements and Performance Criteria

  1. Establish the planning context and framework
  2. Develop agreed planning processes and methodology
  3. Undertake risk research and analysis
  4. Develop/refine planning parameters
  5. Document the emergency plan
  6. Validate and implement planning outcomes
  7. Monitor and review the planning process and outcomes

Required Skills

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level required for this unit

Required Skills

consider wide range of alternatives before making logical decisions

define and solve problems

demonstrate attention to detail

demonstrate effective interpersonal interactions

encourage the participation of other committee members

gain cooperation of stakeholders

listen actively

locate and interpret risk information

manage simple projects

negotiate collective outcomes

provide credible reliable and timely information and well reasoned advice and opinions

recognise the relevance and significance of information for the planning process

resolve conflicts constructively with a minimum of fuss

summarise and explain key information clearly

think creatively big picture outside the box

value diversity of views and perceptions of risks

work cooperatively

work within organisational boundaries and cultures

write clearly concisely using accurate terminology

Required Knowledge

Fundamentals of risk management included in Australian Standard ASNZS ISO Risk managementPrinciples and guidelines

Fundamentals of emergency management planning included in Australian Emergency Management Manual Emergency Planning

decision making techniques

emergency risk management terminology concepts and principles

group dynamics strategies for team building and resolving conflict

meeting procedures

relevant legislative and regulatory requirements

research tools and risk analysis techniques emergency risk management tools

Evidence Required

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Assessment must confirm the ability to

explain the planning process and promote its benefits to a wide range of audiences

develop an appropriate and sustainable emergency planning process in cooperation with stakeholders

work with stakeholders to develop plans that are accepted readily understandable by users and able to be implemented effectively

evaluate planning process and outcomes with stakeholders

Consistency in performance

Competency should be demonstrated in at least two different contexts throughout the life of an emergency planning project or during components of a number of projects one of which may be simulated

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Context of assessment

Competency should be assessed making significant contributions to an emergency planning process either as an individual or as a stakeholder in the workplace or in a simulated workplace environment

Specific resources for assessment

For the demonstration of competence in this unit it will be necessary to participate in a realworld emergency planning project

Underpinning knowledge may be assessed through written assignments project reports debriefings and action learning projects in real or simulated environments

Guidance information for assessment

This unit contains many transferable skills such as communication consultation research and analysis skills that can be applied in the emergency planning context Assessors should use formative assessment strategies in a simulated environment to contextualise underpinning knowledge

Summative assessment requires application of the unit in a realworld project often in an actionlearning context


Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Drivers may include:

changes in community characteristics

changes in legislation, policies and disaster/emergency management plans

changes in insurance policies and premiums

new sources of risk or changed perception of risk

planning deficiencies

recent emergency incident reports/debriefs, safety issues

recent judicial decisions

changes in strategic and corporate plans

Legislative, regulatory and organisational requirements may include:

arrangements specified in legislation

organisational or jurisdictional emergency risk management policies or procedures

existing disaster plans, agreements or memoranda of understanding

local planning regulations, development controls and environmental plans

Stakeholders may include:

staff

client groups

decision makers

emergency service organisations

Practical constraints may include:

arrangements, roles and responsibilities set down in existing emergency management plans

availability of technical expertise, technology, equipment

budgets, time, availability and capability of people

land use planning, building codes and other regulations

legislation covering emergency management, environmental management, safety standards, local government regulations

limited organisational knowledge of emergency risk management processes and benefits

Research tools may include:

affinity analysis

brainstorming, visioning

cause and effect analysis, force field analysis

emergency risk management tools

SWOT analysis

bow-tie analysis

cost:benefit analysis

Emergency risk information may include:

characteristics of natural and built environments

demographics (population distribution, social, cultural, health status and education data)

details of key infrastructure and emergency/support services

economic activity reports (employment, products, services, revenue)

government reports e.g. environmental impacts

business continuity data

emergency risk assessment studies