• AHCCCF409A - Participate in assessments of project submissions

Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

AHCCCF409A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Participate in assessments of project submissions

Version 1.0
Issue Date: March 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency AHCCCF409A - Participate in assessments of project submissions
Description This unit covers the process of participating in the submission assessment process at regional and State/Territory levels for public-funded community programs. It requires the ability to participate in committees, appropriately question and discuss cultural and social issues, rank competing projects, and maintain probity of the assessment. Participating in assessments of project submissions requires knowledge of rural industries and/or natural resource management principles, scope of programs, regional areas, community and issues in areas of communities.
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application This unit applies to those who participate in the submission assessment process at regional and State/Territory levels for public-funded community programs.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites
Competency Field
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Research the applicable program guidelines
  • Policy and program information required to participate in the assessment of projects within a region or State/Territory is obtained and reviewed.
  • Own role and responsibilities are identified within applicable program guidelines and legislative requirements.
  • Own knowledge of policy and program information and legislative requirements is built through involvement in development activities to achieve an understanding of the program aims and goals.
  • Changes in policy and program information are identified for impact on assessment processes.
       
Element: Review the submissions
  • Project submissions are reviewed prior to the assessment committee meeting in the context of policy and program information.
  • Personal review and ranking of projects is completed in preparation for the assessment committee meeting, in accordance with program guidelines.
       
Element: Participate in committee assessment process
  • Projects which meet program guidelines are identified by the committee for further assessment.
  • Submissions seeking further funding for existing projects are identified and reviewed under separate criteria according to program guidelines.
  • Assessments of projects, which have been processed through a local or regional assessment panel, are given a balanced consideration to manage the time taken on the assessment, and to ensure equity and fairness in the process.
  • Projects are reviewed and ranked by the committee in terms of the priorities and other factors defined in the program guidelines.
  • Active listening approaches and appropriate questioning techniques are used to develop an understanding and a team approach across a diverse committee/panel.
  • Projects are selected for recommendation in accordance with program guidelines and available funds.
       
Element: Maintain probity of assessment
  • Confidentiality requirements of the assessment process are maintained.
  • Ethical and legislative standards and procedures of the assessment process are followed.
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

The evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit must be relevant to workplace operations and satisfy holistically all of the requirements of the performance criteria and required skills and knowledge and include achievement of the following:

use monitoring techniques suitable for the environment and species

install and use monitoring equipment

develop systems to capture, maintain and analyse data

make observations and record data on species diversity and abundance

review data to ensure the monitoring process is correctly targeted and implemented.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Competency requires the application of work practices under work conditions. Selection and use of resources for some worksites may differ due to the regional or enterprise circumstances.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Required skills

participate in committees

understand team development

rank competing projects

use literacy skills to read, interpret and follow organisational policies and procedures, develop sequenced written instructions, record accurately and legibly information collected and select and apply procedures to a range of tasks

use oral communication skills/language competence to fulfil the job role as specified by the organisation including questioning, active listening, asking for clarification, negotiating solutions and responding to a range of views

use numeracy skills to estimate, calculate and record routine and more complex workplace measures and data

use interpersonal skills to work with others and relate to people from a range of cultural, social and religious backgrounds and with a range of physical and mental abilities.

Required knowledge

rural industries and/or natural resource management principles

scope of programs

regional areas, community and issues in areas of communities

wide understanding of legislative and program guidelines at appropriate local, regional and State levels.

project assessment processes

program probity requirements

awareness of diversity in community

relevant legislation.

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole.

Submissions may include:

a community group or a number of community groups. Submissions may be for a local area or for a wider region, and may incorporate funding from more than one program.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Policy and program information required to participate in the assessment of projects within a region or State/Territory is obtained and reviewed. 
Own role and responsibilities are identified within applicable program guidelines and legislative requirements. 
Own knowledge of policy and program information and legislative requirements is built through involvement in development activities to achieve an understanding of the program aims and goals. 
Changes in policy and program information are identified for impact on assessment processes. 
Project submissions are reviewed prior to the assessment committee meeting in the context of policy and program information. 
Personal review and ranking of projects is completed in preparation for the assessment committee meeting, in accordance with program guidelines. 
Projects which meet program guidelines are identified by the committee for further assessment. 
Submissions seeking further funding for existing projects are identified and reviewed under separate criteria according to program guidelines. 
Assessments of projects, which have been processed through a local or regional assessment panel, are given a balanced consideration to manage the time taken on the assessment, and to ensure equity and fairness in the process. 
Projects are reviewed and ranked by the committee in terms of the priorities and other factors defined in the program guidelines. 
Active listening approaches and appropriate questioning techniques are used to develop an understanding and a team approach across a diverse committee/panel. 
Projects are selected for recommendation in accordance with program guidelines and available funds. 
Confidentiality requirements of the assessment process are maintained. 
Ethical and legislative standards and procedures of the assessment process are followed. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

AHCCCF409A - Participate in assessments of project submissions
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

AHCCCF409A - Participate in assessments of project submissions

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: