Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

AURJTB002 Mapping and Delivery Guide
Analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle braking systems

Version 1.0
Issue Date: March 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency AURJTB002 - Analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle braking systems
Description
Employability Skills
Learning Outcomes and Application This unit describes the performance outcomes required to analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle braking systems in order to initiate action to sustain, vary or enhance performance. It involves identifying, evaluating, selecting, justifying and documenting the most appropriate rectification method or variation to the rectification method. The unit includes the analysis of multi-system and intermittent faults which may be caused by operating in adverse conditions.It applies to those working in the automotive service and repair industry. The braking systems include those of motorcycles, motor scooters or all-terrain vehicles (ATVs).No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.

Assessors must satisfy NVR/AQTF assessor requirements.

Competency is to be assessed in the workplace or a simulated environment that accurately reflects performance in a real workplace setting.

Assessment must include direct observation of tasks.

Where assessment of competency includes third-party evidence, individuals must provide evidence that links them to the motorcycle braking systems that they have worked on, e.g. repair orders.

Assessors must verify performance evidence through questioning on skills and knowledge to ensure correct interpretation and application.

The following resources must be made available:

automotive repair workplace or simulated workplace

workplace instructions

manufacturer motorcycle braking system specifications

three different motorcycles with faults in the braking systems specified in the performance evidence

diagnostic equipment for motorcycle braking systems

tools, equipment and materials appropriate for analysing and evaluating motorcycle braking systems.

Prerequisites/co-requisites
Competency Field Mechanical - Motorcycle
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Identify and confirm the work requirement
  • Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
  • Specifications for motorcycle braking system are sourced and interpreted
  • System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
  • Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
       
Element: Prepare for analysis and evaluation
  • Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
  • Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
  • Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  • Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
  • Braking system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
       
Element: Carry out failure analysis
  • Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  • Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
  • Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
  • Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
  • Valid conclusions are drawn from the available evidence and documented to workplace requirements
       
Element: Make recommendations
  • Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
  • Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
  • Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
       
Element: Complete work processes
  • Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
  • Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
  • Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures
  • Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
       
Element: Identify and confirm the work requirement
  • Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
  • Specifications for motorcycle braking system are sourced and interpreted
  • System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
  • Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
       
Element: Prepare for analysis and evaluation
  • Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
  • Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
  • Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  • Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
  • Braking system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
       
Element: Carry out failure analysis
  • Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  • Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
  • Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
  • Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
  • Valid conclusions are drawn from the available evidence and documented to workplace requirements
       
Element: Make recommendations
  • Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
  • Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
  • Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
       
Element: Complete work processes
  • Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
  • Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
  • Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures
  • Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

Elements

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance Criteria

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold and italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section.

1. Identify and confirm the work requirement

1.1 Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions

1.2 Specifications for motorcycle braking system are sourced and interpreted

1.3 System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed

1.4 Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

2. Prepare for analysis and evaluation

2.1 Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation

2.2 Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information

2.3 Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

2.4 Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use

2.5 Braking system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

3. Carry out failure analysis

3.1 Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

3.2 Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

3.3 Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes

3.4 Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria

3.5 Valid conclusions are drawn from the available evidence and documented to workplace requirements

4. Make recommendations

4.1 Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information

4.2 Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications

4.3 Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

5. Complete work processes

5.1 Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations

5.2 Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected

5.3 Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures

5.4 Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

Before competency can be determined, individuals must demonstrate they can perform the following according to the standards defined in this unit’s elements, performance criteria, range of conditions and foundation skills:

analyse and evaluate a fault in the:

mechanical braking system of a motorcycle

hydraulic braking system of a different motorcycle

anti-lock braking (ABS) system of a third motorcycle.

Individuals must be able to demonstrate knowledge of:

work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements relating to analysing and evaluating faults in motorcycle braking systems, including procedures for:

lifting and supporting motorcycle braking systems

managing and controlling brake dust and brake fluid

environmental requirements, including procedures for trapping, storing and disposing of brake dust and brake fluid released from braking systems

principles and processes involved in planning and implementing analysis and evaluation of motorcycle braking system faults

design and planning of diagnostic procedures of motorcycle braking system faults, including procedures for diagnosing:

hydraulic faults

mechanical faults

electrical faults

procedures for analysing and evaluating motorcycle braking system faults, including:

system failure analysis

component failure analysis

types, functions, operation and limitations of motorcycle braking systems and components, including:

friction materials

mechanical systems

hydraulic systems

ABS systems

electronic control circuits and valves

testing procedures for motorcycle braking systems, including:

mechanical cables and linkages

hydraulic lines and cylinder integrity and leaks

operation of electronic control module

stopping efficiency

types, functions, operation and limitations of diagnostic testing equipment required to analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle braking systems

procedures for documenting and reporting the analysis and evaluation process

requirements of Australian Design Rules (ADRs) relating to motorcycle braking systems.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Elements

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance Criteria

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold and italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section.

1. Identify and confirm the work requirement

1.1 Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions

1.2 Specifications for motorcycle braking system are sourced and interpreted

1.3 System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed

1.4 Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

2. Prepare for analysis and evaluation

2.1 Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation

2.2 Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information

2.3 Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

2.4 Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use

2.5 Braking system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

3. Carry out failure analysis

3.1 Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

3.2 Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

3.3 Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes

3.4 Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria

3.5 Valid conclusions are drawn from the available evidence and documented to workplace requirements

4. Make recommendations

4.1 Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information

4.2 Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications

4.3 Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

5. Complete work processes

5.1 Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations

5.2 Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected

5.3 Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures

5.4 Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

This section specifies work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below.

Safety and environmental requirements must include:

work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements, including procedures for:

lifting and supporting motorcycle braking systems

managing and controlling brake dust and brake fluid

environmental requirements, including procedures for trapping, storing and disposing of brake dust and brake fluid released from braking systems.

Analytical and evaluative methodology must include:

diagnostic process, sequence, tests and testing equipment.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions 
Specifications for motorcycle braking system are sourced and interpreted 
System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed 
Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements 
Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation 
Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information 
Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures 
Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use 
Braking system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process 
Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures 
Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements 
Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes 
Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria 
Valid conclusions are drawn from the available evidence and documented to workplace requirements 
Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information 
Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications 
Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method 
Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations 
Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected 
Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures 
Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures 
Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions 
Specifications for motorcycle braking system are sourced and interpreted 
System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed 
Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements 
Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation 
Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information 
Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures 
Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use 
Braking system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process 
Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures 
Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements 
Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes 
Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria 
Valid conclusions are drawn from the available evidence and documented to workplace requirements 
Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information 
Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications 
Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method 
Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations 
Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected 
Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures 
Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

AURJTB002 - Analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle braking systems
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

AURJTB002 - Analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle braking systems

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: