Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

CUVPRP202A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Participate in planning work for nominated sites

Version 1.0
Issue Date: March 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency CUVPRP202A - Participate in planning work for nominated sites
Description This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to participate in planning work for a site selected for an artwork or installation.
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application People working in all areas of arts practice apply the skills and knowledge described in this unit. A typical context would be public art, which involves the creation of artworks in public spaces. At this level, work is usually undertaken under supervision, though some autonomy and judgement can be expected within established parameters.More complex skills associated with selecting and planning work at sites are covered in CUVPRP402A Select sites for creative projects and plan work.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites Not applicable.
Competency Field
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Document site characteristics
  • Liaise with relevant people as part of the process for selecting sites
  • Identify the types of information required about nominated sites
  • Collect information about nominated sites from relevant sources of information
  • Identify site characteristics that may affect the planning of work options
  • Accurately document relevant site characteristics and present to relevant people as required
       
Element: Assist with planning
  • Determine the impact of site characteristics on work options in consultation with relevant people
  • Contribute ideas on work options for nominated sites
  • Participate in the process of selecting work options which best respond to site characteristics and ideas for work
  • Participate in the development of procedures and plans for producing work options
  • Document procedures using appropriate format and present to relevant people as required
  • Seek feedback on own work and note areas for future improvement
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Evidence of the ability to:

contribute to the process of selecting work options that are responsive to the characteristics of nominated sites

source information about nominated sites

document work plans.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Assessment must ensure access to:

a site where work is being planned.

Method of assessment

A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:

evaluation of the candidate’s role in assisting with the planning of work for a specific site

evaluation of work plans or research completed by the candidate

questioning and discussion of the candidate’s intentions and work outcome

review of portfolios of evidence

review of third-party reports from experienced practitioners.

Assessment methods should closely reflect workplace demands (e.g. literacy) and the needs of particular groups (e.g. people with disabilities, and people who may have literacy or numeracy difficulties, such as speakers of languages other than English, remote communities and those with interrupted schooling.

Guidance information for assessment

Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:

CUVPRP302A Document the work progress

CUVRES201A Source and use information relevant to own arts practice.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Required skills

communication skills to:

clarify information requirements

work cooperatively as a team member

respond appropriately to feedback on own work

initiative and enterprise skills to contribute ideas about work options for nominated sites

literacy skills to source, interpret and document information on nominated sites

numeracy skills to calculate general specifications for sites

planning and organising skills to collect and review information on sites

self-management skills to meet deadlines.

Required knowledge

types of site information needed for planning work and potential sources

options for documenting planning processes and work procedures

workflow planning techniques in relation to production of work for a site

awareness of intellectual property issues and legislation as it impacts on site work

OHS requirements in relation to the creation of work in public spaces and other typical sites.

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Relevant people may include:

clients

industry practitioners

managers

mentors

supervisors.

Process for selecting sites may involve liaison with:

architecture, landscape architecture and urban planning companies

artist-run studios

artists

government agency and funding organisations

local arts community

local councils.

Types of information may include:

physical characteristics of the site:

buildings

dimensions

flora

industries

land forms

location

overhead wires

pathways

presence of fauna

roads

waterways

planning regulations

reports, such as:

council

geology

government

weather

social, economic and historical characteristics, including:

status as a community meeting place

economic conditions

heritage values

industrial area

sacred space

urban renewal.

Sources of information may include:

discussions or interviews with artists, designers or craftspeople

galleries

internet

libraries

museums

personal observations and experience

print and electronic media

reference books.

Documenting may include:

diagrams

drawings

photographs

slides

specifications

text notes, e.g. diary entries

video and digital images and text.

Characteristics may include:

environmental considerations

heritage values

physical constraints:

access

changing contours of the landscape

cliffs

weather conditions

political and economic influences

sacred or religious significance.

Criteria for selecting work options may include:

consistency with conceptual vision

intellectual property issues

financial considerations

heritage, cultural and religious values

practical and environmental considerations for equipment, materials and access

requirements for seeking development approval.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Liaise with relevant people as part of the process for selecting sites 
Identify the types of information required about nominated sites 
Collect information about nominated sites from relevant sources of information 
Identify site characteristics that may affect the planning of work options 
Accurately document relevant site characteristics and present to relevant people as required 
Determine the impact of site characteristics on work options in consultation with relevant people 
Contribute ideas on work options for nominated sites 
Participate in the process of selecting work options which best respond to site characteristics and ideas for work 
Participate in the development of procedures and plans for producing work options 
Document procedures using appropriate format and present to relevant people as required 
Seek feedback on own work and note areas for future improvement 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

CUVPRP202A - Participate in planning work for nominated sites
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

CUVPRP202A - Participate in planning work for nominated sites

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: