Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

MSACMG802A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Audit the use of competitive tools

Version 1.0
Issue Date: April 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency MSACMG802A - Audit the use of competitive tools
Description This unit covers auditing the use of competitive manufacturing tools, modifying a tool or its application and changing the mix of tools used as appropriate. It also covers changing the emphasis and culture away from the use of competitive manufacturing tools as the main focus to taking a whole of enterprise approach with the tools being seen as supporting measures to strategic goals. The unit has a more strategic focus than MSACMG702A Review manufacturing practice tools and techniques.
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application This unit is intended for managers and people with a similar sphere of influence and scope of authority and responsibility. It is focused on auditing the practice of competitive manufacturing and implementing changes identified through the audit. For a more global unit covering developing the strategic approach adopted by the organisation refer to MSACMG801A Develop the competitive manufacturing approach.The unit includes monitoring workplace practice and the application of selected tools and taking action to ensure progress is continuing towards the desired future state. The unit applies to individuals who are familiar with competitive manufacturing and with a broad range of competitive tools with depth in a moderate range of tools. Where this is not the case the following units which deal more with the selection and introduction of the correct tools for the organisation may be completed:MSACMS600A Develop a competitive manufacturing system MSACMS606A Introduce competitive manufacturing to a small or medium enterprise.This unit may also be applied to service organisations applying competitive manufacturing principles.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites
Competency Field
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Establish systems to monitor progress towards becoming competitive
  • Determine agreed indicators of progress towards desired future state
  • Capture information showing progress towards desired future state
  • Analyse information to determine continued progress towards desired future state
  • Ensure there are systems which allow monitoring to proceed routinely
       
Element: Identify areas of manufacturing practice to improve in consultation with work teams and other employees
  • Identify work teams and areas which could be making better progress towards desired future state
  • Examine competitive tools being used and their contribution towards progress
  • Examine other work practices and their contribution towards progress
  • Manage the required stakeholder consultations
  • Agree on the cause or causes of progress which is not to plan
  • Determine appropriate competitive tools use to improve progress
  • Develop an implementation plan
       
Element: Facilitate the improvement to manufacturing practice across the enterprise
  • Obtain support and necessary approvals from process/system owners
  • Arrange for the introduction of new tools or modifications to existing tool practice as required
  • Arrange for skills and other infrastructure development as required
  • Consult with stakeholders including value chain members about the impact of these changes
  • Manage implementation of proposed changes to tools use
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Demonstrates skills and knowledge required to:

critically review continuous improvement processes.

In particular look for evidence of:

review of use of competitive tools

introduction of new tools or modification of the use of existing tools

integration of tools with the overall manufacturing strategy and future state.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Assessment may occur on the job or in an appropriately simulated environment. Access is required to real or appropriately simulated situations, including work areas, materials and equipment, and to information on workplace practices and OHS practices.

Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.

Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.

Method of assessment

Assessment must satisfy the endorsed assessment guidelines of the Manufacturing Training Package.

Assessment methods must confirm consistency and accuracy of performance (over time and in a range of workplace relevant contexts) together with application of underpinning knowledge.

Assessment methods must be by direct observation of tasks and include questioning on underpinning knowledge to ensure its correct interpretation and application.

Assessment may be applied under project related conditions (real or simulated) and require evidence of process.

Assessment must confirm a reasonable inference that competency is able not only to be satisfied under the particular circumstance, but is able to be transferred to other circumstances.

Assessment may be in conjunction with assessment of other units of competency where required.

Guidance information for assessment

Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Required skills

decision making

communication at all levels

situation analysis

negotiation

Required knowledge

competitive manufacturing principles

competitive manufacturing tools, their applications and limitations

customer benefit

ways of determining competency gaps

define, measure, analyse, improve and control (DMAIC) process applied to tool use

desired future state

how to measure progress towards desired future state

root cause analysis

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Future state

Future state may include:

process reliability

waste

health, safety and environment (HSE)

maintenance

systems

Codes of practice/standards

Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used

Health, safety and environment (HSE)

All changes implemented are expected to be at least neutral, or preferably beneficial, in their impact on health, safety and environment

Organisation

Organisation includes:

any part of a manufacturing or service organisation

companies, government bodies or other body of people aiming to produce a product to service a customer

Desired future state

Desired future state refers to:

the agreed position of where the organisation wants to be

Competitive tools

Those techniques used to improve competitive manufacturing, typically described in the competitive manufacturing 'tools units' including:

5S

Just in time (JIT)/kanban

quick changeover

root cause analysis

value chain mapping

proactive/preventative maintenance

6 sigma

standardisation

balance scorecard

Progress not to plan

Progress not to plan includes:

both progress which falls short of plan and which exceeds plan

Improvements

Improvements include:

the use of different or additional tools

the application of the current tools in use in a different way

a change of emphasis from 'tools' to an accepted part of the organisation's culture

Manager

Manager may include:

any person who may have either a permanent or an ad hoc role in facilitating the function of multiple teams in a workplace, departments or entire organisations

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Determine agreed indicators of progress towards desired future state 
Capture information showing progress towards desired future state 
Analyse information to determine continued progress towards desired future state 
Ensure there are systems which allow monitoring to proceed routinely 
Identify work teams and areas which could be making better progress towards desired future state 
Examine competitive tools being used and their contribution towards progress 
Examine other work practices and their contribution towards progress 
Manage the required stakeholder consultations 
Agree on the cause or causes of progress which is not to plan 
Determine appropriate competitive tools use to improve progress 
Develop an implementation plan 
Obtain support and necessary approvals from process/system owners 
Arrange for the introduction of new tools or modifications to existing tool practice as required 
Arrange for skills and other infrastructure development as required 
Consult with stakeholders including value chain members about the impact of these changes 
Manage implementation of proposed changes to tools use 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

MSACMG802A - Audit the use of competitive tools
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

MSACMG802A - Audit the use of competitive tools

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: