Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

PSPBORD405A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Develop operational effectiveness of detector dog teams

Version 1.0
Issue Date: April 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency PSPBORD405A - Develop operational effectiveness of detector dog teams
Description This unit covers the requirements to ensure that each detector dog team develops and maintains a high level of operational effectiveness. It includes identifying development needs, coordinating the development of each detector dog team, and monitoring workflow and outcomes.In practice, developing operational effectiveness of detector dog teams may overlap with other generalist and specialist public sector work activities such as acting ethically, complying with legislation, applying government processes, using resources, developing work plans, etc.This is a new unit of competency, added to the Border Protection Competency field of the Training Package in 2004.
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application Not applicable.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites Not applicable.
Competency Field Border Protection.
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities 		Slides
PPT 		Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Identify the development needs of the detector dog team
  • The level of operational readiness of each detector dog team is assessed in accordance with organisational standards.
  • The technical understanding and ability of each handler is assessed in accordance with organisational training standards.
  • The potential of each dog is assessed in accordance with organisational standards.
       
Element: Coordinate the development of each detector dog team
  • Strategies for developing the team are identified.
  • A development plan for each team is prepared in conjunction with the handler.
  • Effective training and deployment techniques are adopted.
  • Custody, transport and utilisation of training aids is undertaken in accordance with legislation, policy and guidelines.
  • The team is provided with detailed feedback.
       
Element: Monitor workflow
  • The workflow for each team is monitored in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.
  • The team's workload is balanced against the demands of the workplace and the need for development and training.
       
Element: Monitor outcomes
  • Detector dog team maintenance and development training is monitored and documented.
  • Detector dog team performance is regularly evaluated and documented.
  • Staff are involved in the identification of improvements to procedures and processes.
  • Continuous improvements are made to procedures, processes and outcomes.
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.

Units to be assessed together

Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil

Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil

Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:

PSPBORD406A Conduct detector dog team training

PSPETHC401A Uphold and support the values and principles of public service

PSPGOV403B Use resources to achieve work unit goals

PSPGOV404B Develop and implement work unit plans

PSPLEGN401A Encourage compliance with legislation in the public sector

Overview of evidence requirements

In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:

the knowledge requirements of this unit

the skill requirements of this unit

application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework)

development of operational effectiveness of detector dog teams in a range of (3 or more) contexts ( or occasions, over time)

Resources required to carry out assessment

These resources include:

legislation, policy, procedures and guidelines relating to development of the operational effectiveness of detector dog teams

case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of situations likely to be encountered when developing the operational effectiveness of detector dog teams

Where and how to assess evidence

Valid assessment of this unit requires:

a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when developing operational effectiveness of detector dog teams, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine

development of operational effectiveness of detector dog teams in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:

people with disabilities

people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

women

young people

older people

people in rural and remote locations

Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:

demonstration

observation

questioning

simulation or role plays

authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses

For consistency of assessment

Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments

Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)

Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Skill requirements

Look for evidence that confirms skills in:

deploying detector dogs

maintaining detector dog proficiency

analysing training records to identify and record training deficiencies

applying all facets of detector dog training, theory and deployment

identifying strengths and weaknesses of detector dog teams

producing and implementing detector dog team training and assessment of high quality

providing feedback to team members

responding to diversity, including gender and disability

applying occupational health and safety and environmental procedures in the context of detector dog team training

Knowledge requirements

Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:

best practice training and development techniques for detector dog teams

performance standards for detector dog and detector dog teams

assessment techniques

workplace and industry environment

equity and diversity principles

public sector legislation including occupational health and safety and environment related to detector dog team training

The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here.

The detector dog team: comprises

a dog and handler with a unique style, approach, potential, strengths and weaknesses

Potential is based on:

strengths and weaknesses

dog's learning capacity

success in training

Strategies involve:

a structured approach to training and development which is tailored to meet the specific needs of the team

Development plan:

outlines the strategies and timeline for the progressive development of the team

Effective training and deployment techniques relate to:

agency approved training and deployment principles

occupational health and safety

Legislation, policy and guidelines may include:

enabling legislation and regulations, such as:

Customs Act 1901

Quarantine Act 1908

organisational policies and procedures, particularly detector dog program training, operational and training aid control

occupational health and safety

national and regional standard operating procedures

work instructions

occupational health and safety and environment

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
The level of operational readiness of each detector dog team is assessed in accordance with organisational standards. 
The technical understanding and ability of each handler is assessed in accordance with organisational training standards. 
The potential of each dog is assessed in accordance with organisational standards. 
Strategies for developing the team are identified. 
A development plan for each team is prepared in conjunction with the handler. 
Effective training and deployment techniques are adopted. 
Custody, transport and utilisation of training aids is undertaken in accordance with legislation, policy and guidelines. 
The team is provided with detailed feedback. 
The workflow for each team is monitored in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. 
The team's workload is balanced against the demands of the workplace and the need for development and training. 
Detector dog team maintenance and development training is monitored and documented. 
Detector dog team performance is regularly evaluated and documented. 
Staff are involved in the identification of improvements to procedures and processes. 
Continuous improvements are made to procedures, processes and outcomes. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

PSPBORD405A - Develop operational effectiveness of detector dog teams
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Assessment Record Sheet

PSPBORD405A - Develop operational effectiveness of detector dog teams

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: