Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

PSPFRAU401B Mapping and Delivery Guide
Monitor data for indicators of fraud

Version 1.0
Issue Date: March 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency PSPFRAU401B - Monitor data for indicators of fraud
Description This unit covers the collection of data from a wide variety of sources and its input into appropriate data management systems for interrogation to identify indicators of fraud and corruption. It includes collating and interrogating data and monitoring for indicators of fraud and corruption. Fraud in the unit title incorporates both fraud and corruption. In practice, monitoring data for indicators of fraud and corruption may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector workplace activities such as acting ethically, complying with legislation, exercising regulatory powers, etc.Related units of competency dealing with investigation, evidence, powers of arrest, etc are located in the Regulatory Competency field of the Training Package. No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application Not applicable.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites Not applicable.
Competency Field Fraud Control.
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Collate data
  • Relevant data sources are identified and data is collected that is compatible, useful, relevant, reliable, valid and timely.
  • Data is organised in prescribed form in accordance with the identified information needs and uses.
  • Data is checked for accuracy, suitability and compliance with legal and privacy responsibilities and security.
  • The need to liaise with specialists is determined and acted on in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.
  • Ways to improve fraud and corruption control data content, interfaces and usefulness are monitored, and recommendations are made to supervisors and other stakeholders.
       
Element: Interrogate data
  • Quantitative and/or qualitative analyses are performed to obtain required outcomes in accordance with the purpose of each analysis.
  • Analysis and description tools and techniques are selected appropriate to the nature of the information and the required outcome.
  • Priority of data to be interrogated is determined in consultation with appropriate people, and work is organised accordingly.
  • An understanding of the nature of the program or activity from which the data is obtained, the way in which the information is structured in the system and the likely indications of fraud and corruption activities are reflected in the analysis of material.
  • Preliminary recommendations are expressed in the detail, format and timeframe required.
       
Element: Monitor for indicators of fraud and corruption
  • Fraud and corruption or possible fraud and corruption situations are identified, staff and systems alerted and actions initiated.
  • Where indicators arise for which there are no precedents, information is referred to the appropriate people for further analysis.
  • Trends indicating activities outside control limits are reported for further analysis and investigation.
  • Checks are made for internal consistency and compliance with established structure, rules and authorities for accessing information.
  • Variations from standards and guidelines are reported in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.

Units to be assessed together

Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil

Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil

Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:

PSPETHC401A Uphold and support the values and principles of public service

PSPGOV406B Gather and analyse information

PSPLEGN401A Encourage compliance with legislation in the public sector

PSPREG401C Exercise regulatory powers

PSPREG402C Promote client compliance

PSPREG415A Receive and validate data

Overview of evidence requirements

In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:

the knowledge requirements of this unit

the skill requirements of this unit

application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework)

monitoring of data for indicators of fraud and corruption in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Resources required to carry out assessment

These resources include:

fraud and corruption control guidelines

fraud investigation standards

public sector values and codes of conduct

organisational procedures and manuals

legislation, procedures and protocols relating to fraud and corruption control

legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing

case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of fraud/corruption situations likely to be encountered

Where and how to assess evidence

Valid assessment of this unit requires:

a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when monitoring data for indicators of fraud and corruption, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine

monitoring of data for indicators of fraud and corruption in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:

people with disabilities

people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

women

young people

older people

people in rural and remote locations

Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:

case studies

demonstration

observation

portfolios

projects

questioning

scenarios

simulation or role plays

authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses

For consistency of assessment

Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and/or apply the competency in different situations or environments.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Skill requirements

Look for evidence that confirms skills in:

undertaking research and analysis

interrogating data to detect patterns indicating fraud and corruption

applying effective management of data, abiding by all agency guidelines, formats and systems

correctly recording data into information systems

using data matching to identify factors required for an investigation

collating and organising of data to assist in an investigation

using a range of communication styles to suit different audiences and purposes

responding to diversity, including gender and disability

using computer software for data analysis and matching

applying occupational health and safety and environmental procedures in the context of fraud and corruption control data monitoring

literacy skills to effectively read and interpret data

Knowledge requirements

Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:

legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing

privacy, confidentiality or other specific legislation and guidelines relating to fraud and corruption control

freedom of information legislation

guidelines issued by standards-setting organisations

organisation's programs and client base

legislation and corresponding links with the organisation's programs

how data is managed within the organisation

legislation, policies and procedures relating to fraud and corruption control including occupational health and safety and environment

The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here.

Data may include:

electronic systems

paper-based systems

client data

other individuals and organisations

Stakeholders may include:

staff and senior management

clients

law enforcement agencies

organisations providing data

standards-setting organisations

Purposes of data analysis may include:

response to ongoing or individual requests for information from specified people to check for particular information

matching data as part of a random check

conducting a needs assessment for fraud and corruption prevention and awareness activities

generating and initiating fraud and corruption control activities

Actions resulting from data interrogation may include:

investigation or inquiry

legislative change

administrative change

policy change

improved referral to another organisation for investigation

Guidelines may include:

legislation and guidelines prepared by relevant standards-setting organisations

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Relevant data sources are identified and data is collected that is compatible, useful, relevant, reliable, valid and timely. 
Data is organised in prescribed form in accordance with the identified information needs and uses. 
Data is checked for accuracy, suitability and compliance with legal and privacy responsibilities and security. 
The need to liaise with specialists is determined and acted on in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. 
Ways to improve fraud and corruption control data content, interfaces and usefulness are monitored, and recommendations are made to supervisors and other stakeholders. 
Quantitative and/or qualitative analyses are performed to obtain required outcomes in accordance with the purpose of each analysis. 
Analysis and description tools and techniques are selected appropriate to the nature of the information and the required outcome. 
Priority of data to be interrogated is determined in consultation with appropriate people, and work is organised accordingly. 
An understanding of the nature of the program or activity from which the data is obtained, the way in which the information is structured in the system and the likely indications of fraud and corruption activities are reflected in the analysis of material. 
Preliminary recommendations are expressed in the detail, format and timeframe required. 
Fraud and corruption or possible fraud and corruption situations are identified, staff and systems alerted and actions initiated. 
Where indicators arise for which there are no precedents, information is referred to the appropriate people for further analysis. 
Trends indicating activities outside control limits are reported for further analysis and investigation. 
Checks are made for internal consistency and compliance with established structure, rules and authorities for accessing information. 
Variations from standards and guidelines are reported in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

PSPFRAU401B - Monitor data for indicators of fraud
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

PSPFRAU401B - Monitor data for indicators of fraud

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: