- PSPFRAU505B - Develop fraud control plans
Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners
PSPFRAU505B Mapping and Delivery Guide
Develop fraud control plans
Version 1.0
Issue Date: March 2024
Qualification | - |
Unit of Competency | PSPFRAU505B - Develop fraud control plans |
---|---|---|---|
Description | This unit covers planning actions in response to the organisation's fraud/corruption control strategy, either the preparation of a specific fraud/corruption control plan based on a risk assessment or as an extension of the organisation's documentation of its fraud/corruption control strategy. The unit includes identifying areas for action, gaining commitment to the plan, identifying qualitative and quantitative performance indicators, and documenting and disseminating the fraud/corruption control plan.Fraud in the unit title incorporates both fraud and corruption. In practice, developing fraud control plans may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector workplace activities such as acting ethically, promoting compliance with legislation, delivering client services, anticipating fraud activity, conducting fraud risk assessments, etc.This unit replaces and is equivalent to PSPFRAU505A Develop fraud control plan.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication | ||
Employability Skills | This unit contains employability skills. | ||
Learning Outcomes and Application | Not applicable. | ||
Duration and Setting | X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting. |
||
Prerequisites/co-requisites | Not applicable. | ||
Competency Field | Fraud Control. |
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners | Student Learning Resources | Handouts Activities |
Slides PPT |
Assessment 1 | Assessment 2 | Assessment 3 | Assessment 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elements of Competency | Performance Criteria | |||||||
Element: Identify areas for action |
| |||||||
Element: Gain commitment to fraud/corruption control plan |
| |||||||
Element: Identify qualitative and quantitative performance indicators |
| |||||||
Element: Document fraud/corruption control plan |
| |||||||
Element: Disseminate fraud/corruption control plan |
| |||||||
Element: Identify areas for action |
| |||||||
Element: Gain commitment to fraud/corruption control plan |
| |||||||
Element: Identify qualitative and quantitative performance indicators |
| |||||||
Element: Document fraud/corruption control plan |
| |||||||
Element: Disseminate fraud/corruption control plan |
|
Evidence Required
List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package. | |
Units to be assessed together | Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to: PSPETHC501B Promote the values and ethos of public service PSPFRAU502B Anticipate and detect possible fraud activity PSPFRAU504B Conduct fraud risk assessments PSPGOV502B Develop client services PSPGOV504B Undertake research and analysis PSPGOV517A Coordinate risk management PSPLEGN501B Promote compliance with legislation in the public sector |
Overview of evidence requirements | In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms: the knowledge requirements of this unit the skill requirements of this unit application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework) development of fraud/corruption control plans in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time) |
Resources required to carry out assessment | These resources include: legislation, policy and procedures relating to fraud and corruption control fraud and corruption control guidelines and standards AS/NZS 4360:1999 or as revised public sector values and codes of conduct case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of fraud/corruption planning activities likely to be undertaken |
Where and how to assess evidence | Valid assessment of this unit requires: a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when developing fraud and corruption control plans, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine development of fraud/corruption control plans in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time) Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as: people with disabilities people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people women young people older people people in rural and remote locations Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of: case studies portfolios projects questioning scenarios authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses |
For consistency of assessment | Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments |
Submission Requirements
List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here
Assessment task 1: [title] Due date:
(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)
Assessment Tasks
Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.
This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Skill requirements Look for evidence that confirms skills in: identifying areas for action based upon an analysis and synthesis of objectives and information from the fraud/corruption control strategy, the processes established to identify fraud and corruption vulnerability, and agency corporate plans planning, analysis and evaluation relating to fraud and corruption risk control using a range of communication, consultation and negotiation styles to suit different audiences and purposes applying complex documents such as legislation, guidelines and standards managing contractors if the fraud/corruption risk assessment is outsourced responding to diversity, including gender and disability applying occupational health and safety and environmental procedures in the context of fraud and corruption control |
Knowledge requirements Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of: jurisdictional fraud and corruption control requirements agency fraud and corruption control strategy and agency processes to measure fraud and corruption vulnerability agency structure and core business activities fraud and corruption risk factors in the organisation, agency clients, and any history of fraud and corruption in or against the agency the processes established to identify fraud and corruption vulnerability and agency corporate plans anti-discrimination and diversity legislation legislation, policies and procedures relating to fraud and corruption control |
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here. | |
Identification of areas may include: | information from internal and external sources |
Stakeholders may include: | agency staff and senior management contractors and consultants standards-setting organisations |
Specialist personnel | consultants and contractors internal and external audit personnel personnel from law enforcement and prosecution agencies personnel from standards-setting organisations |
Fraud/corruption control strategies and activities | fraud/corruption control strategy process for identifying risks fraud/corruption vulnerability risk assessment methodology fraud/corruption control plan |
Components of a fraud/corruption control plan | overview of agency's attitude to fraud and corruption and the means by which it encourages ethical behaviour responsibilities in relation to fraud and corruption control and the agency's relationships with other agencies outlines of how risks are identified and assessed descriptions of the processes which are vulnerable to fraud and corruption and actions proposed to overcome those vulnerabilities responsibilities within the agency for actions identified within the plan and an implementation timetable procedures for the preparation, maintenance and review of the agency's fraud/corruption control plans agency fraud and corruption awareness and training strategy agency conduct and disciplinary standards statement on how the plan aligns with legislative and judicial requirements (such as reporting and confidentiality) relevant contacts for further information (internal and external) |
Relevant legislation and guidelines may include: | jurisdictional legislation covering agency responsibilities in fraud and corruption control guidelines such as: Fraud control policy of the Commonwealth Commonwealth fraud control guidelines Fraud control: developing an effective strategy (NSW) those released by standards-setting organisations such as Risk management, AS/NZS 4360:1999 or as revised |
Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.
Observation Checklist
Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice | Yes | No | Comments/feedback |
---|---|---|---|
Processes are established to identify fraud and corruption risks and vulnerability | |||
Areas are identified for action through the fraud/corruption risk assessment process or some other process for identifying fraud and corruption vulnerability | |||
Initiatives are developed in consultation with appropriate staff to control identified vulnerabilities | |||
Areas within the organisation responsible for fraud and corruption minimisation actions are identified | |||
Consultation with stakeholders is undertaken to develop a shared understanding of responsibilities | |||
Timeframe for implementation of actions is specified based upon an understanding of the nature of risk and resource ramifications | |||
Professional development awareness and information programs are initiated in consultation with responsible staff | |||
Fraud/corruption prevention initiatives are tailored to the organisational culture, core business and client groups | |||
Advice is sought from internal and external specialist personnel | |||
Stakeholders are involved in the development of performance indicators | |||
Performance indicators are developed that relate to the objectives of the program and enable an assessment of the extent to which fraud and corruption control objectives are being achieved | |||
Feedback mechanisms are established to ensure that performance data informs improvements to fraud/corruption controlstrategies and activities | |||
Control plan is documented using concise language and structure tailored to the intended audience/s | |||
The responsibilities for fraud and corruption control of each area in the organisation are clearly articulated in the plan | |||
Risks targeted by the risk assessment process are used to identify areas for action | |||
A comprehensive fraud/corruption control strategy for the organisation is reflected in the plan | |||
The plan is linked to internal audit to reduce overlap or duplication | |||
The requirements of any jurisdictional fraud and corruption control legislation and guidelines are addressed in the plan | |||
Non-confidential components of the fraud/corruption control plan are made accessible to staff, the Minister and clients of the organisation | |||
Confidential components are documented and stored appropriately | |||
Review of the plan is conducted in accordance with organisational and jurisdictional needs and requirements | |||
Processes are established to identify fraud and corruption risks and vulnerability. | |||
Areas are identified for action through the fraud/corruption risk assessment process or some other process for identifying fraud and corruption vulnerability. | |||
Initiatives are developed in consultation with appropriate staff to control identified vulnerabilities. | |||
Areas within the organisation responsible for fraud and corruption minimisation actions are identified. | |||
Consultation with stakeholders is undertaken to develop a shared understanding of responsibilities. | |||
Timeframe for implementation of actions is specified based upon an understanding of the nature of risk and resource ramifications. | |||
Professional development awareness and information programs are initiated in consultation with responsible staff. | |||
Fraud/corruption prevention initiatives are tailored to the organisational culture, core business and client groups. | |||
Advice is sought from internal and external specialist personnel. | |||
Stakeholders are involved in the development of performance indicators. | |||
Performance indicators are developed that relate to the objectives of the program and enable an assessment of the extent to which fraud and corruption control objectives are being achieved. | |||
Feedback mechanisms are established to ensure that performance data informs improvements to fraud/corruption control strategies and activities. | |||
Control plan is documented using concise language and structure tailored to the intended audience/s. | |||
The responsibilities for fraud and corruption control of each area in the organisation are clearly articulated in the plan. | |||
Risks targeted by the risk assessment process are used to identify areas for action. | |||
A comprehensive fraud/corruption control strategy for the organisation is reflected in the plan. | |||
The plan is linked to internal audit to reduce overlap or duplication. | |||
The requirements of any jurisdictional fraud and corruption control legislation and guidelines are addressed in the plan. | |||
Non-confidential components of the fraud/corruption control plan are made accessible to staff, the Minister and clients of the organisation. | |||
Confidential components are documented and stored appropriately. | |||
Review of the plan is conducted in accordance with organisational and jurisdictional needs and requirements. |
Forms
Assessment Cover Sheet
PSPFRAU505B - Develop fraud control plans
Assessment task 1: [title]
Student name:
Student ID:
I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.
Student signature:
Result: Competent Not yet competent
Feedback to student
Assessor name:
Signature:
Date:
Assessment Record Sheet
PSPFRAU505B - Develop fraud control plans
Student name:
Student ID:
Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent
(add lines for each task)
Feedback to student:
Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent
Assessor name:
Signature:
Date:
Student signature:
Date: