ELEMENT

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

1. Assess options and select actions

1.1 Existing systems and procedures are assessed for compliance with fraud/corruption control plan and strategy, and broader organisational objectives.

1.2 Possible courses of action are determined based on an assessment of relevant resources and personnel available and integration with organisational activities.

1.3 Agreement of relevant staff and management is obtained on key features of the fraud/corruption control activities within their area of responsibility.

1.4 Resource implications and efficiency and effectiveness of options are assessed.

1.5 Desired outcomes are specified in consultation with stakeholders.

1.6 Preferred options are recommended to senior management and agreed to by those responsible for implementation.

2. Set down procedures and expectations for staff

2.1 Key tasks and deadlines are specified and a project timeline is prepared when appropriate.

2.2 Ethical standards and guidelines are developed in consultation with stakeholders.

2.3 Procedures are developed outlining the obligations and protections relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing legislation.

2.4 Procedures are documented, tested and disseminated through most effective channels.

2.5 Opportunities for identifying possible new risks and threats are included in the procedures.

2.6 Refinements and adjustments to procedures are made on the basis of regular reviews and evaluation.

3. Implement performance evaluation and monitoring systems

3.1 Mechanisms to monitor implementation are identified through consultation with appropriate people.

3.2 Relevant information and methods of comparing progress of implementation procedures to objectives of fraud/corruption control plan are agreed between those involved.

3.3 Quality of work, extent of progress, resource usage and other critical features are assessed and variations or adjustments to the fraud/corruption control plan are recommended.

3.4 Authorities are kept informed of progress of implementation and of problems as they arise in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.

3.5 Regular reporting activities are used to provide advice regarding impact of procedures on effectiveness of fraud/corruption control strategy.

This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Skill requirements

Look for evidence that confirms skills in:

planning, analysis and evaluation relating to fraud and corruption risk control

ensuring compliance of activities with fraud/corruption control plan and fraud/corruption control strategy

consulting with staff or personnel responsible for relevant activities or components of the activities specified

using a range of communication, consultation and negotiation styles to suit different audiences and purposes

responding to diversity, including gender and disability

writing reports requiring formal language and structure on the effectiveness of fraud and corruption control activities

managing widespread dissemination of activities in the agency

applying occupational health and safety and environmental procedures in the context of fraud and corruption control

Knowledge requirements

Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:

jurisdictional fraud and corruption control requirements

agency fraud and corruption control strategy

best practice initiatives in fraud and corruption control

client base and any history of fraud and corruption against the agency

control testing and evaluation

agency structure and core business activities

fraud and corruption risk factors in the organisation, agency clients, and any history of fraud and corruption in or against the agency

anti-discrimination and diversity legislation

legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing

legislation, policies and procedures relating to fraud and corruption control

The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.

Units to be assessed together

Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil

Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil

Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:

PSPETHC501B Promote the values and ethos of public service

PSPFRAU502B Anticipate and detect possible fraud activity

PSPFRAU505B Develop fraud control plans

PSPGOV502B Develop client services

PSPGOV504B Undertake research and analysis

PSPLEGN501B Promote compliance with legislation in the public sector

Overview of evidence requirements

In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:

the knowledge requirements of this unit

the skill requirements of this unit

application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework)

implementation of fraud/corruption control activities in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Resources required to carry out assessment

These resources include:

legislation, policy and procedures relating to fraud and corruption control

legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing

fraud and corruption control guidelines and standards

public sector values and codes of conduct

case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of fraud and corruption control activities likely to be undertaken

Where and how to assess evidence

Valid assessment of this unit requires:

a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when implementing fraud and corruption control activities, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine

implementation of fraud and corruption control activities in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:

people with disabilities

people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

women

young people

older people

people in rural and remote locations

Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:

case studies

portfolios

projects

questioning

scenarios

authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses

For consistency of assessment

Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments

The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here.

Fraud/corruption control activitiesmay include:

controls which reduce or eliminate the risk of fraud and corruption

awareness raising and training activities

Stakeholders may include:

agency staff and senior management

agency clients

contractors and consultants

industry associations

internal/external audit personnel

standards-setting organisations

Effective channels for dissemination of informationmay include:

internal manuals and guidelines

internal audits, directives and reports

public documents

training and awareness sessions

consultation with:

industry organisations

clients

specialist personnel or contractors

community groups

standards-setting organisations

electronic communication, such as intranet, Internet or email