The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Compile diagnostic tool knowledge requirements
|
|
Compile a portfolio of sample reports of diagnostic test results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Compile peer reviewed papers on the use of each diagnostic tool Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review the diagnostic tool specifications and user manuals Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research output ranges for each diagnostic tool Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify key thresholds and benchmarks Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine suitability of tool selection for purpose of test Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the data and testing methods
|
|
Identify and evaluate testing methods used Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assess relevance, benefits and limitations of methodology used Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine assumptions used Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine currency of the equipment, software or system used Completed |
Evidence:
|
Access raw data and testing evidence where available Completed |
Evidence:
|
Verify data relevance and accuracy Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review references cited in the report Completed |
Evidence:
|
Record non-conforming practices and treatments Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify instances of incorrect application of diagnostic tools Completed |
Evidence:
|
Highlight unsupported statements and factual errors Completed |
Evidence:
|
Detail significant omissions, errors and ambiguities Completed |
Evidence:
|
Detail inconsistencies and errors of logic Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify variances to specifications Completed |
Evidence:
|
Detail incorrect use of arboricultural terminology Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate and critique test results
|
|
Assess the suitability of the testing process as fit for purpose Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the test results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Compare evaluation with original interpretation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Consider and account for anomalies Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine the validity of outcomes of original report Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop substantiated positions to inform critical analysis of test results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine further testing required to verify or falsify results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document feedback on original results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare critique document the report
|
|
Compile the analysis Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review the completeness and accuracy of the analysis Completed |
Evidence:
|
Record analysis outcomes and rationale Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document the analytical processes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide alternative analysis and conclusion Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document critique in a report Completed |
Evidence:
|
Present report in agreed format and within agreed timelines Completed |
Evidence:
|