NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: AHCCCF501 - Evaluate project submissions

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

AHCCCF501 - Evaluate project submissions

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Review previously planned project outcomes

  1. Identify updates to proposed project outcomes and evaluation processes
  2. Conduct consultations with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation
  3. Identify availability of data and suitable range of methods to evaluate project progress
Identify updates to proposed project outcomes and evaluation processes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conduct consultations with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify availability of data and suitable range of methods to evaluate project progress

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Develop evaluation approach for project submissions

  1. Develop criteria for evaluation of project applications or submissions
  2. Develop decision making process for evaluating and accepting or rejecting project submissions
  3. Consult with stakeholders on proposed criteria and decision making process
  4. Review process based on stakeholder feedback and organisational requirements
  5. Develop review panel for evaluation of project submissions
  6. Communicate decision making process and selection criteria to review panel, project applicants and other key stakeholders
Develop criteria for evaluation of project applications or submissions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Develop decision making process for evaluating and accepting or rejecting project submissions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consult with stakeholders on proposed criteria and decision making process

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review process based on stakeholder feedback and organisational requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Develop review panel for evaluation of project submissions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communicate decision making process and selection criteria to review panel, project applicants and other key stakeholders

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluate project submissions

  1. Acknowledge receipt of all project submissions
  2. Use agreed processes and criteria to evaluate project submissions
  3. Review decisions with other panellists to determine outcomes
Acknowledge receipt of all project submissions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Use agreed processes and criteria to evaluate project submissions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review decisions with other panellists to determine outcomes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communicate decisions

  1. Communicate decisions of panel to project applicants
  2. Provide feedback on submissions and reasons for decisions
  3. Publish outcomes according to organisational policies and procedures
Communicate decisions of panel to project applicants

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provide feedback on submissions and reasons for decisions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Publish outcomes according to organisational policies and procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report on and implement conclusions

  1. Prepare report to program, agency and project requirements
  2. Check analysis and report conclusions with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included
  3. Ensure report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process
  4. Ensure data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements
  5. Submit report according to project, program and agency requirements
  6. Implement report conclusions to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority
Prepare report to program, agency and project requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Check analysis and report conclusions with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ensure report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ensure data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Submit report according to project, program and agency requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implement report conclusions to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

Element

Performance criteria

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1. Review previously planned project outcomes

1.1 Identify updates to proposed project outcomes and evaluation processes

1.2 Conduct consultations with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation

1.3 Identify availability of data and suitable range of methods to evaluate project progress

2. Develop evaluation approach for project submissions

2.1 Develop criteria for evaluation of project applications or submissions

2.2 Develop decision making process for evaluating and accepting or rejecting project submissions

2.3 Consult with stakeholders on proposed criteria and decision making process

2.4 Review process based on stakeholder feedback and organisational requirements

2.5 Develop review panel for evaluation of project submissions

2.6 Communicate decision making process and selection criteria to review panel, project applicants and other key stakeholders

3. Evaluate project submissions

3.1 Acknowledge receipt of all project submissions

3.2 Use agreed processes and criteria to evaluate project submissions

3.3 Review decisions with other panellists to determine outcomes

4. Communicate decisions

4.1 Communicate decisions of panel to project applicants

4.2 Provide feedback on submissions and reasons for decisions

4.3 Publish outcomes according to organisational policies and procedures

5. Report on and implement conclusions

5.1 Prepare report to program, agency and project requirements

5.2 Check analysis and report conclusions with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included

5.3 Ensure report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process

5.4 Ensure data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements

5.5 Submit report according to project, program and agency requirements

5.6 Implement report conclusions to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority

Required Skills and Knowledge

Element

Performance criteria

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1. Review previously planned project outcomes

1.1 Identify updates to proposed project outcomes and evaluation processes

1.2 Conduct consultations with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation

1.3 Identify availability of data and suitable range of methods to evaluate project progress

2. Develop evaluation approach for project submissions

2.1 Develop criteria for evaluation of project applications or submissions

2.2 Develop decision making process for evaluating and accepting or rejecting project submissions

2.3 Consult with stakeholders on proposed criteria and decision making process

2.4 Review process based on stakeholder feedback and organisational requirements

2.5 Develop review panel for evaluation of project submissions

2.6 Communicate decision making process and selection criteria to review panel, project applicants and other key stakeholders

3. Evaluate project submissions

3.1 Acknowledge receipt of all project submissions

3.2 Use agreed processes and criteria to evaluate project submissions

3.3 Review decisions with other panellists to determine outcomes

4. Communicate decisions

4.1 Communicate decisions of panel to project applicants

4.2 Provide feedback on submissions and reasons for decisions

4.3 Publish outcomes according to organisational policies and procedures

5. Report on and implement conclusions

5.1 Prepare report to program, agency and project requirements

5.2 Check analysis and report conclusions with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included

5.3 Ensure report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process

5.4 Ensure data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements

5.5 Submit report according to project, program and agency requirements

5.6 Implement report conclusions to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority

The candidate must be assessed on their ability to integrate and apply the performance requirements of this unit in a workplace setting. Performance must be demonstrated consistently over time and in a suitable range of contexts.

The candidate must provide evidence that they can:

develop evaluation approach and criteria

develop review panel and review processes

evaluate submissions against criteria

communicate panel decisions to project applicants, including feedback on the reasons for decisions

prepare reports to agency, project or program requirements

The candidate must demonstrate knowledge of:

facilitation and mediation techniques

legislation and regulations appropriate to projects being submitted

basic budgeting skills

reporting and publishing requirements

data collection and analysis techniques

Range Statement