The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Review previously planned project outcomes
|
|
Proposed project outcomes and evaluation approaches are identified from original approved application and any updates. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Consultations are conducted with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators as required to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Timing and evaluation in terms of project progress are determined to identify availability of data and suitable range of evaluation methods. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop evaluation approach
|
|
Evaluation approach is developed to include resources used and processes applied within the available data collection opportunities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluation approach is developed around prior project evaluations, and program and agency requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Proposed evaluation approach is discussed with stakeholders to obtain comments and consent. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Proposed evaluation approach is modified to cater for stakeholder views without compromising program and agency requirements and the evaluation results. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Approval is obtained for evaluation approach and timing according to program and agency requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organise data collection
|
|
Data is collected on project inputs, processes and outcomes according to evaluation approach. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate instructions are provided to others for them to collect data on behalf of the evaluator. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate forms and questionnaires are designed to implement the evaluation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interviews are conducted and observations made according to the planned evaluation approach. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data is recorded in format suitable for analysis and reporting. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Accuracy of data is checked according to evaluation practice and program and agency requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse data
|
|
Data is analysed according to the evaluation plan to obtain required information on inputs, processes and outputs. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data is analysed progressively during evaluation to identify any deficiencies. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Any deficiencies in data are rectified where possible by changes in evaluation and data collection methods. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate software is used for quantitative analysis. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis is recorded to program and agency requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Report on and implement conclusions
|
|
Report is prepared to program, agency and project requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis and report conclusions are checked with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Report is submitted according to project, program and agency requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Report on conclusions is implemented to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority. Completed |
Evidence:
|