The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Determine land management/production objectives
|
|
Land users and other stakeholders are consulted regarding local objectives. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives address major land uses and production activities in the local area affected by the impacts of the target pests. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives relate to the problem definition and the reduction in the pest impacts and associated losses. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives comply with national, state and regional legislation and regulations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives support strategies for land and pest management. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Estimate costs and advantages for management units
|
|
The diversity of land management and production values that the target pests affect within the local area is defined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely costs of preferred options for control of pest populations and/or changes to land management or production activities associated with each value are estimated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely costs are compared with the impacts and losses caused by the target pests. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The management units most affected, both actually and potentially, by the target pests are defined and prioritised. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Define the performance level for each land management/production objective
|
|
Performance levels are defined in accordance with sustainable land use principles to address target pests population levels, economic impacts and environmental impacts. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Performance levels are realistic and measurable. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Select management options for the target pests
|
|
Options for controlling pest populations and/or changing land management or production practices are assessed in terms of economic factors, technical difficulty, practical feasibility, social and/or environmental acceptability. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A range of management options are assessed in terms of current and future financial support, when control activities are to be implemented, level of target pests population reduction required, and the most suitable control methods and techniques. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A management option is selected in accordance with sustainable land use principles, economic feasibility, environmental acceptability, Integrated Pest Management (IPM) principles, and statutory requirements for pest control. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Negotiate possible actions with relevant stakeholder
|
|
The action is based on the definition of the problem using data from measurement of abundance and impacts. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The action clearly documents the pest problem, the objectives, the stakeholders, the prioritised management units, the performance criteria, and the most suitable management options. Completed |
Evidence:
|