NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: AURJTD006 - Analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle steering, suspension and frame systems

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

AURJTD006 - Analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle steering, suspension and frame systems

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Identify and confirm the work requirement

  1. Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
  2. Specifications for motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system are sourced and interpreted
  3. System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
  4. Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specifications for motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system are sourced and interpreted

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepare for analysis and evaluation

  1. Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
  2. Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
  3. Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  4. Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
  5. Motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carry out failure analysis

  1. Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  2. Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
  3. Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
  4. Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
  5. Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements
Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Make recommendations

  1. Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
  2. Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
  3. Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complete work processes

  1. Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
  2. Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
  3. Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures
  4. Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify and confirm the work requirement

  1. Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
  2. Specifications for motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system are sourced and interpreted
  3. System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
  4. Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specifications for motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system are sourced and interpreted

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepare for analysis and evaluation

  1. Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
  2. Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
  3. Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  4. Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
  5. Motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process
Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carry out failure analysis

  1. Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
  2. Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
  3. Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
  4. Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
  5. Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements
Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Make recommendations

  1. Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
  2. Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
  3. Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method
Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complete work processes

  1. Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
  2. Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
  3. Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures
  4. Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures
Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

Elements

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance Criteria

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold and italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section.

1. Identify and confirm the work requirement

1.1 Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions

1.2 Specifications for motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system are sourced and interpreted

1.3 System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed

1.4 Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

2. Prepare for analysis and evaluation

2.1 Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation

2.2 Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information

2.3 Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

2.4 Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use

2.5 Motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

3. Carry out failure analysis

3.1 Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

3.2 Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

3.3 Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes

3.4 Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria

3.5 Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements

4. Make recommendations

4.1 Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information

4.2 Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications

4.3 Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

5. Complete work processes

5.1 Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations

5.2 Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected

5.3 Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures

5.4 Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

Required Skills and Knowledge

Elements

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance Criteria

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold and italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the range of conditions section.

1. Identify and confirm the work requirement

1.1 Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions

1.2 Specifications for motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system are sourced and interpreted

1.3 System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed

1.4 Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

2. Prepare for analysis and evaluation

2.1 Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation

2.2 Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information

2.3 Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

2.4 Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use

2.5 Motorcycle steering, suspension or frame system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

3. Carry out failure analysis

3.1 Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures

3.2 Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements

3.3 Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes

3.4 Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria

3.5 Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements

4. Make recommendations

4.1 Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information

4.2 Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications

4.3 Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

5. Complete work processes

5.1 Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations

5.2 Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected

5.3 Tools and equipment are checked and stored according to workplace procedures

5.4 Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

Before competency can be determined, individuals must demonstrate they can perform the following according to the standards defined in this unit’s elements, performance criteria, range of conditions and foundation skills:

analyse and evaluate a fault in the:

steering system of a motorcycle

suspension system of a different motorcycle

frame system of a third motorcycle.

Individuals must be able to demonstrate knowledge of:

work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements relating to analysing and evaluating faults in motorcycle steering, suspension and frame systems, including procedures for working with stored energy in springs

environmental requirements, including procedures for trapping, storing and disposing of oils released from steering, suspension and frame systems

principles and processes involved in planning and implementing analysis and evaluation of motorcycle steering, suspension and frame system faults

design and planning of diagnostic procedures of motorcycle steering, suspension and frame system faults, including procedures for diagnosing:

hydraulic faults

mechanical faults

electrical faults

procedures for analysing and evaluating motorcycle steering, suspension and frame system faults, including:

system failure analysis

component failure analysis

types, functions, operation and limitations of the following systems, including:

steering, including:

head tube

headset bearings

triple clamp

suspension, including:

shock absorbers, including twin shock and mono-shock absorbers

telescopic fork suspension

inverted telescopic fork suspension

front telelever and duolever

rear suspension, including twin shock swingarm, monoshock swingarm, monoshock single sided swingarm, rear monolever and rear paralever

frames, including:

tubular frame

alloy formed section

composite materials

testing procedures for motorcycle steering, suspension and frame systems, including:

mechanical linkages

shock absorber performance under load

damper performance under load

frames for fatigue and stress

types, functions, operation and limitations of diagnostic testing equipment required to analyse and evaluate faults in motorcycle steering, suspension and frame systems

procedures for documenting and reporting the analysis and evaluation process

requirements of Australian Design Rules (ADRs) relating to motorcycle steering, suspension and frame systems.

Range Statement

This section specifies work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below.

Safety and environmental requirements must include:

work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements, including procedures for working with stored energy in springs

environmental requirements, including procedures for trapping, storing and disposing of oils released from steering, suspension and frame systems.

Analytical and evaluative methodology must include:

diagnostic process, sequence, tests and testing equipment.