The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish pre-assessment procedure
|
|
Units and elements to be pre-assessed are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Applicable standards for pre-assessment are reviewed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre-assessment procedures are planned to be valid, reliable, flexible and fair Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre-assessment is integrated with other training and assessment activities where applicable Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre-assessment procedures and standards are discussed with trainee Completed |
Evidence:
|
Necessary changes to planned pre-assessment due to training or other factors are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Changes are discussed with trainee and supervisor Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review evidence
|
|
Evidence requirements specified in applicable standards are reviewed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Available evidence is confirmed as being valid, sufficient, authentic and current Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evidence demonstrating consistency of performance in pre-assessment is included Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assist trainee
|
|
Trainee's ability to self-assess performance against applicable standards is developed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Two-way communication and feedback on the pre-assessment process is ensured Completed |
Evidence:
|
Adjustments are made based on trainee characteristics if they do not compromise the integrity of the competency standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Supervisor or other relevant opinions are sought when more expertise is needed to assist with pre-assessment Completed |
Evidence:
|
Timely Threat and Error Management procedures are applied during skills pre-assessment where the trainee fails to manage an undesired aircraft state Completed |
Evidence:
|
Make pre-assessment
|
|
Assistance is sought from relevant persons in providing additional evidence when required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Competence is pre-assessed against the standards using the available evidence Completed |
Evidence:
|
The application of Threat and Error Management is pre-assessed through demonstration Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre-assessment decision is completed in compliance with regulatory requirements and procedural fairness Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clear and comprehensive feedback is provided to the trainee, together with recommended additional training if required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Record pre-assessment
|
|
Pre-assessment is recorded promptly and accurately in accordance with regulatory requirements and training organisation procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant personnel are notified and any additional training requirements are recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review pre-assessment
|
|
Pre-assessment process is reviewed by self-assessment, consultation with peers and supervisors Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for improvement are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
The review is documented and recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|