The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Analyse the Australian administrative legal system.
|
|
Differences between common law, statute law, delegated legislation and local government law are analysed and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Civil law and examples of civil action relevant to building accessibility of large-scale buildings are researched and analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Administrative law relevant to building accessibility is researched and analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate administrative law applicable to building accessibility.
|
|
Individual elements of judicial review legislation are evaluated and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Natural justice issues related to decision making through the building control process are identified and evaluated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Describe the procedures and benefits of enforcing the law.
|
|
Legislative benefits and examples of building accessibility enforcement are researched, analysed and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Major regulatory enforcement strategies are identified and recorded. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The powers of entry of building certifiers are identified and analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The legal considerations of a building certifier obtaining a warrant are identified and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The types of evidence required to investigate and prove a breach of legislation are identified, gathered and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes for addressing non-compliance issues are identified and appropriate documentation is prepared in a format suitable for review by a building certifier. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the impact of any other legislation on state and territory legislation regarding building and development control and access.
|
|
Implications of commonwealth legislation on access upon state and territory building and development control legislation are examined and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implications of other state and territory legislation on building and development control legislation and access are examined and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the professional code of practice applicable to the assessment of accessible large-scale buildings.
|
|
The code of practice required by building industry regulators is analysed and evaluated in accordance with organisational requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Concepts regarding working within own area of personal competence are evaluated and practised. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Concepts regarding duty of care as it relates to common law are evaluated and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Concepts regarding conflict of interest as specified by relevant legislation are identified and managed appropriately. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the responsibilities and liabilities of access consultants and building certifiers and develop effective working relationships.
|
|
Responsibilities and liabilities of access consultants are evaluated and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The statutory duties, responsibilities and liabilities of building certifiers as specified by relevant legislation are evaluated and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Strategies for establishing and building effective working relationships between access consultants and building certifiers are developed and implemented. Completed |
Evidence:
|