The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Determine the level of impairment in human anatomy and body function within a defined population.
|
|
Key functional systems of the human body are identified accurately. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate terminology for describing impairment of key body functions is selected and applied. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The relationship between impairment, disability and handicap is recognised. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Extent of impairment in a defined population is recorded in a recognised format for retrieval and statistical analysis in accordance with organisational requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the impact of anatomical and functional impairment of the musculoskeletal system on the mobility needs of a defined population, and the consequences for accessible design.
|
|
Published accessibility design data for mobility is assessed against anatomical and functional impairment data for its ability to meet the mobility needs of the defined population. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data on anatomical and functional impairment of the musculoskeletal system for a defined population is compared with published accessibility design data to identify any differences in mobility needs and the extent of those differences. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Possible causes for the difference between the defined population and the published accessibility design data are identified, and the likely consequences of altering published accessibility design data are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the impact of anatomical and functional impairment of the eye and vision system on the wayfinding needs of a defined population and the consequences for accessible design.
|
|
Published accessibility design data for wayfinding is assessed against anatomical and functional impairment of the eye and vision system data for its ability to meet the wayfinding needs of the defined population. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data on anatomical and functional impairment of the eye and vision system for a defined population is compared with published accessibility design data to identify any differences in mobility needs and the extent of those differences. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Possible causes for the difference between the defined population and the published accessibility design data are identified, and the likely consequences of altering published accessibility design data are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse the impact of anatomical and functional impairment of the ear and auditory system on the communication needs of a defined population and the consequences for accessible design.
|
|
Published accessibility design data for communication is assessed against anatomical and functional impairment of the ear and auditory system data for its ability to meet the communication needs of the defined population. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data on anatomical and functional impairment of the ear and auditory system for a defined population is compared with published accessibility design data to identify any differences in mobility needs and the extent of those differences. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Possible causes for the difference between the defined population and the published accessibility design data are identified, and the likely consequences of altering published accessibility design data are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|