The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Assess the proposal from the building control authority.
|
|
The nature of the proposal documentation is classified as a Building Upgrade Plan, an Alternative Building Solution or an application for exception from a requirement of the BCA. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Access issues raised by the building control authority are identified, clarified and documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The grounds for a request for unjustifiable hardship are identified from within the proposal documentation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply unjustifiable hardship principles to the assessment of the Building Upgrade Plan.
|
|
Key access components of the Building Upgrade Plan are identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A technical assessment of the issues identified in the Building Upgrade Plan is conducted in accordance with the Process to Administer Access to Buildings. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The level of access resulting from the Building Upgrade Plan is determined in accordance with legislative requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The appropriateness of the timeframes proposed by the Building Upgrade Plan is assessed and the findings are documented in accordance with unjustifiable hardship considerations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply unjustifiable hardship principles to the assessment of the Alternative Building Solution.
|
|
The performance of the Alternative Building Solution for providing access outcomes equivalent to the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions of the relevant legislative requirements is assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A technical assessment of the issues identified in the application for Alternative Building Solution is conducted in accordance with the Process to Administer Access to Buildings. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The ability of the Alternative Building Solution to provide access is assessed in accordance with unjustifiable hardship considerations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Unjustifiable hardship considerations are assessed and the findings are documented in accordance with the objectives of the DDA and state and territory anti-discrimination legislation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply unjustifiable hardship principles to the assessment of the application for exception from a requirement of the BCA.
|
|
The issues nominated in the proposal as preventing the provision of access are identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A technical assessment of the issues identified in the application for exception is conducted in accordance with the Process to Administer Access to Buildings. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The validity of the issues presented in the application for exception from a requirement of the BCA is assessed against unjustifiable hardship considerations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Unjustifiable hardship decisions are assessed and the findings are documented in accordance with the objectives of the DDA and state and territory anti-discrimination legislation. Completed |
Evidence:
|