The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Source and manage a range of information to inform consideration of access solutions.
|
|
Sources of information on the effects of disabilities and the interaction of people with disabilities and the built environment are researched and evaluated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sources of information on compliance requirements for access to and use of the built environment are researched and evaluated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Forums for discussion and debate regarding solutions for providing access to and use of the built environment are researched and evaluated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes are put in place to ensure access to and currency of information regarding legislative changes and best practice solutions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information management system is developed and maintained to ensure currency. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is shared and discussed with internal or external personnel as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse information to deliver access solutions in the built environment.
|
|
Best practice international and national solutions that provide access to and use of the built environment are researched. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Solutions are assessed for their capacity to address the requirements of people with differing abilities and disabilities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Potentially suitable solutions are assessed in relation to their cost-effectiveness and compliance with Australian legislation,standards and codes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
New and emerging developments in design, construction and fit-out solutions are researched and monitored and relevant information is applied to analysis of requirements for access to and use of the built environment. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse information regarding compliance requirements for access to and use of the built environment.
|
|
Content and application of applicable legislation, codes and standards are analysed in relation to access and use requirements of people with disabilities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Content and application of government policies and urban planning regulations are analysed in relation to ergonomic principles and access and use requirements of people with disabilities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Conflicting compliance provisions and access issues that are not the subject of legislation are identified, and access solutions are analysed and critiqued. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Critique information and assess its role in the provision of advice.
|
|
Professional judgement is used to evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of potential access solutions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Professional colleagues and networks are consulted to share information and critique the efficacy and efficiency of potential access solutions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research findings on best practice access and use solutions are documented and shared with colleagues and other professionals. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Mechanisms are put in place to review and contribute to the updating of professional literature regarding access to the built environment. Completed |
Evidence:
|