The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Organise information
|
|
Instructions to conduct the processing activity are received and details are confirmed with supervisor as necessary Completed |
Evidence:
|
Intelligence outputs are identified in accordance with user and client requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Security requirements are maintained throughout the process in accordance with standard procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Work timelines are confirmed to ensure that outputs will be available; if not advice is sought from supervisor Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information or data is converted for use in the analytical process Completed |
Evidence:
|
Collected information is evaluated in accordance with standard procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information gaps are identified and reported to supervisor Completed |
Evidence:
|
Benchmarks and evaluation criteria appropriate to the intelligence requirement are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Work health and safety (WHS) requirements, and safety precautions are applied throughout the process Completed |
Evidence:
|
Legal requirements for activities are identified and applied during the process Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse and interpret information
|
|
Appropriate thinking process is used to interpret the information Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assumptions that have been made about the processing of information are stated in a way that is clear, justified and consistent with work objectives Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analytical and diagnostic techniques are selected that are reliable and appropriate to the intelligence requirement Completed |
Evidence:
|
Trends are identified and analysed in light of environmental and cultural factors relevant to the particular situation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysed information is interpreted to identify relevance to the operation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interpretations are made based on the factual, quantitative, and qualitative information Completed |
Evidence:
|
Possible interpretations are tested, refined and consolidated to review credibility and consistency with new information Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop inferences
|
|
Assumptions in arguments leading to inferences are clearly stated to inform clients and users Completed |
Evidence:
|
Inferences are formulated from tested interpretations and facts Completed |
Evidence:
|
Chain of reasoning in formulating inferences is clear to ensure transparency to clients and users Completed |
Evidence:
|
Inferences are reviewed to identify and address any fallacies in reasoning Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommendations on intelligence analysis outcomes are developed and reported to inform clients and users Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review analysis processes
|
|
Results and conclusions are reviewed with relevant person/s wherever possible Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis processes and outcomes are evaluated in accordance with client and user requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes are managed and adjusted in accordance with evaluation and feedback from clients and users Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information and detail related to analysis and evaluation is reported to appropriate parties in accordance with standard procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|