The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Review programs
|
|
Program costs and estimates are compared with budget allocations and financial projections Completed |
Evidence:
|
Impact of revenue, cost and operational changes on program together with project completion costs plus program objectives are analysed and estimated using standard financial analysis and resource management techniques Completed |
Evidence:
|
Program outcomes and performance are evaluated against objectives to identify variations, contingencies, and scope for review and development Completed |
Evidence:
|
Financing options, including costs and timeframes and expected returns are assessed against program goals and objectives Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contribute to strategic development
|
|
Long term financial objectives and resource management objectives are developed to support organisational goals and aims Completed |
Evidence:
|
Trends and environmental factors are identified through consultation and using standard financial analysis and resource management techniques Completed |
Evidence:
|
Realistic assessments are made of financial and resource management implications of external influencing factors on future objectives and present position Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organisational strengths and weaknesses are evaluated against external relationships and environmental factors Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop options for improvement
|
|
Causes of variations in projected organisational outcomes are identified and appropriate contingency plans are developed and implemented to minimise losses Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organisational plans are regularly reviewed to encompass changes to operational environment and assess factors influencing achievement of objectives Completed |
Evidence:
|
Improvement options are identified and evaluated against organisational weaknesses Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish systems to support change
|
|
Strategic reviews monitor program allocations including analysis of resource management needs, information technology needs and management processes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Expenditure and revenue items are monitored to ensure compliance with budget and variations identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Aims and goals of identified changes are communicated systematically to staff and personnel using recognised communication processes and techniques Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information on changes is readily available and procedures and guidelines are developed to promote absorption of changes into organisational practices Completed |
Evidence:
|