The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Select software
|
|
Applicable occupational health and safety (OHS), environmental, legislative and organisational requirements relevant to drawing and detailing trusses or frames using computerised systems are identified and followed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Software options are reviewed and evaluated against specified work requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate software program is selected and referred to for direction Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interpret plans and loading conditions
|
|
Plans and work requirements are identified, interpreted and assessed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Drawing views and notes are interpreted, and other design requirements and restrictions are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Additional information and data are obtained from appropriatepersonnel and other sources Completed |
Evidence:
|
Functional and pictorial image of structures, trusses or frames is created Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design requirements outside normal software limitations are specified and referred to appropriate personnel Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication with others is established and maintained in line with OHS requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Test design options and select optimum
|
|
Fixed designdetails are transferred to layout data in line with software requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Frame or truss types are specified and timber type and species selected in line with material suitability and availability Completed |
Evidence:
|
Common industry spacing of frames, trusses and their components are set to the defined design structure in line with industry standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Component sizes are fixed to clarify and confirm design options Completed |
Evidence:
|
Layouts, spacing and sizing of individual structural members are progressively selected in line with software requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design details are selected, reviewed and revised in line with work order Completed |
Evidence:
|
Produce layouts and cutting requirements
|
|
Design records are reviewed for design integrity, completeness and consistency in line with workplace and applicable certifying authority standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Structure layout drawings and truss or frame assemblydrawings are produced using software in line with workplace and software requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Component cutting detail is produced in line with manufacturing requirements and schedules Completed |
Evidence:
|
Installationpackage is assembled in line with workplace procedures and industry standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design records and documentation are completed and maintained in line with workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assist in production and construction
|
|
Questions regarding designs and assembly decisions are answered and explained in a clear and concise manner Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective communication techniques are used to assist and develop production personnel Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alternative materials or sizes for components are provided within the scope of the design and work requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Common site problems are discussed and prevention strategies examined and adopted to ensure future site practice meets design requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|