NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: ICAS5111B - Review and manage delivery of maintenance services

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

ICAS5111B - Review and manage delivery of maintenance services

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Review service standards

  1. Review service-level agreements
  2. Identify actual fault reporting and restoration performance and compare with service-level agreements to ensure they meet requirements
  3. Record areas of discrepancy
Review service-level agreements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify actual fault reporting and restoration performance and compare with service-level agreements to ensure they meet requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Record areas of discrepancy

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review infrastructure

  1. Identify internal support and maintenance options
  2. Undertake a review of infrastructure to understand service delivery context
  3. Record areas of discrepancy
Identify internal support and maintenance options

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undertake a review of infrastructure to understand service delivery context

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Record areas of discrepancy

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine and implement solutions

  1. Compare service standards and infrastructure discrepancies and identify gaps in existing service
  2. Document discrepancies identified
  3. Determine cost-effective solutions and impact
  4. Implement solutions
Compare service standards and infrastructure discrepancies and identify gaps in existing service

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Document discrepancies identified

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine cost-effective solutions and impact

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implement solutions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Organise reviews

  1. Determine guidelines for regular reviews with stakeholders
  2. Undertake reviews as per agreed guidelines
  3. Document review process and submit to the stakeholder
  4. Ensure effective reporting procedures are in place and used
Determine guidelines for regular reviews with stakeholders

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undertake reviews as per agreed guidelines

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Document review process and submit to the stakeholder

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ensure effective reporting procedures are in place and used

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Evidence of the following is essential:

Assessment must confirm sufficient knowledge of compliance with service-level agreement.

Assessment must confirm the ability to critically analyse and prioritise requests according to business requirements.

To demonstrate competency in this unit the learner will require access to:

Clients wishing to define and review a service-level agreement

Established IT service infrastructure

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Reports measuring performance against agreement

The provision of maintenance services are often specified under formal service-level agreements (SLAs). These agreements need to consider business processes and requirements as well as clearly specifying and quantifying service levels. Other provisions which could be included relate to evaluation or audit of service levels particularly workload and performance considerations, as well as expectations regarding servicing, penalties, and charge-back arrangements to business units.

Changes to service-level agreements involve reviewing current maintenance services in order to determine gaps in services to clients.

The breadth, depth and complexity covering planning and initiation of alternative approaches to skills or knowledge applications across a broad range of technical and/or management requirements, evaluation and coordination would be characteristic.

The demonstration of competency may also require self-directed application of knowledge and skills, with substantial depth in some areas where judgement is required in planning and selecting appropriate equipment, services and techniques for self and others.

Assessment must ensure:

Applications involve participation in development of strategic initiatives as well as personal responsibility and autonomy in performing complex technical operations or organising others. It may include participation in teams including teams concerned with planning and evaluation functions. Group or team coordination may also be involved.

Method of assessment

The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.

Competency in this unit should be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.

Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.

Guidance information for assessment

Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended.

An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:

Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating theoretical concepts, with substantial depth in some areas

Analyse and plan approaches to technical problems or management requirements

Transfer and apply theoretical concepts and/or technical or creative skills to a range of situations

Evaluate information, using it to forecast for planning or research purposes

Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to broad quantity and quality parameters

Take some responsibility for the achievement of group outcomes

Maintain knowledge of industry products and services

Required Skills and Knowledge

Required skills

Problem solving skills for a defined range of unpredictable problems involving participation in the development of strategic initiatives

Plain English literacy and communication skills in relation to analysis, evaluation and presentation of information

Teamwork skills involving the contribution to solutions and goals of a non-routine or contingency nature

Group facilitation and presentation skills in relation to transferring and collecting information and gaining consensus on concepts

Negotiation skills in relation to other team members and applied to a defined range of predictable problems

Report writing skills for business requiring depth in some areas, analysis and evaluation of information in a defined range of areas

Change management skills in relation to maintaining the continuity of IT operations and business functions

Customer service skills in relation to reviewing change procedures

Skills in handling difficult clients in relation to reviewing change procedures

Conflict resolution skills in relation to reviewing change procedures

Risk analysis skills in relation to reviewing change procedures

Required knowledge

Help desk and maintenance practices

Current industry-accepted hardware and software products, with broad knowledge of general features and capabilities

The role of stakeholders and the degree of stakeholder involvement

General knowledge of the client business domain

Detailed knowledge of the system's current functionality

Broad knowledge of change control procedures

Detailed knowledge of the system under modification

Broad knowledge of capacity planning

Context of changes being implemented

Business scheduling requirements

Range Statement

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Service-level agreement

May exist for many different infrastructure services, including communications carriers, ISPs, ASPs and SLAs for vendor products.

SLAs should consider business processes and requirements, clearly specify and quantify service levels, identify evaluation or audit of service levels. May include workload and performance considerations, expectations regarding servicing, penalties, charge back to business units.

Stakeholders may include:

sponsor

user

development team

project team

Maintenance options may include:

On-site response

Remote diagnostics

Return to depot

On-line real-time support

Web-based support

Business hours only support

Continuous support and technical help

Telephone support

Second-level support