The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Implement the crime prevention action plan
|
|
Planned methods, strategies and resources are reviewed in order to confirm the current capacity of the organisation or community to implement the crime prevention initiatives. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implementation processes for the crime prevention initiatives are finalised, including strategies for managing contingencies within stated processes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implementation processes are clearly communicated and promoted to relevant stakeholders in a timely manner. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Initiatives are implemented using processes that are culturally acceptable and respectful of community or organisational established values, issues and structures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Resources required to support initiatives are obtained in accordance with organisational procedures and, in the case of external resources, in accordance with negotiated protocols. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Methods, strategies and use of resources are implemented in accordance with the negotiated and endorsed action plan. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Coordinate activities, agencies and participants
|
|
Networks are established and maintained to maximise resources and opportunities for effective collaboration throughout implementation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The work of personnel (including volunteers, where appropriate) in implementing initiatives is supported and coordinated to enable the achievement of planned outcomes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Structural arrangements are established that generate a sense of identity for, and promote ownership of initiatives among, stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contributions are made to public media management in accordance with organisational protocols and include responses to negative publicity. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication with all participants and relevant stakeholders is regularly maintained throughout implementation and is correct, factual, timely, customer-focused and in accordance with relevant guidelines, legislation and standards. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Overall management of implementation takes a holistic approach that considers all activities of the participating organisations as an integrated system. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Lead teams involved in implementation of initiatives
|
|
Teams that are inclusive and representative of those with an interest in and ability to contribute to a successful final outcome are established and tasks are delegated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Liaison with external contractors is regularly undertaken to ensure tasks are completed in accordance with contractual agreements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advice and guidance are readily provided to teams and external contractors, where appropriate, to ensure work outcomes comply with initiatives' planned work and timeframes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Solutions to issues or problems arising are negotiated with team members in a constructive and collaborative manner. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective and consistent leadership that fosters the building of teams, motivates commitment to initiatives and, where necessary, helps overcome stakeholder rivalry and conflict is demonstrated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate crime prevention initiatives
|
|
Evaluation processes are open and accountable and enable immediate and effective participation of all relevant stakeholders, including community groups with special needs. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluation criteria are feasible, realistic, reliable, ethical and cost-effective and provide timely information to enable implementation issues or problems to be identified and addressed early. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback on initiatives' design, processes and/or outcomes is gathered from as many different perspectives and sources as possible. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information on the implementation of initiatives is gathered with due regard for participants' social and cultural values, beliefs, needs and privacy or confidentiality entitlements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Progress is reviewed and, where necessary, adjustments to work, resources and timelines are made. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information and data collected are analysed to identify the relationship between actual performance and performance indicators and the reasons for any differences are noted and, where appropriate, qualified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sustainability strategies are regularly reviewed to determine viability and long-term relevance of initiatives to community needs. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Reports are documented in accordance with organisational or community requirements and the nature of the evaluation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluation findings are reported to all relevant parties and used to inform future decision making and contribute to development of best practice. Completed |
Evidence:
|