The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Determine the effectiveness of the environmental impact of current practices
|
|
Impact of existing waste management practices is noted against legislation, industry standards, and council and community requirements and expectations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data contributing to cost-benefit analysis is collected on existing waste management practices. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The effects of existing waste practices on the environment are regularly monitored. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The waste impact cycle is monitored for components of waste stream in council area. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Resource usage in waste impact cycle is measured accurately. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor waste reduction targets
|
|
Targets for reducing impact of waste are monitored in accordance with community standards and relevant authority requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Performance is measured accurately, regularly and in a cost-effective manner. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Statistical comparisons are made between targets and performance to establish accurately if targets have been met. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contribute to the development of a waste impact reduction plan
|
|
Consultation with the community and relevant authorities and organisations is undertaken as directed to assist in developing targets and strategies to reduce waste impact. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria to prioritise strategies are suggested. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information to assist comparison with similar methods in practice elsewhere and assess effectiveness of strategies is contributed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate trial and sampling techniques are followed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Follow strategies to reduce waste impact
|
|
Strategic priorities are followed to provide the most effective resolution of issues within available resources. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes are monitored to ensure the strategy is achieving objectives and modifications are suggested as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Program time lines, schedules and targets are followed to enable strategy objectives to be met. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor effectiveness of strategies to reduce waste
|
|
Data is collected and analysed on a regular basis to provide accurate measures of performance. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Comparisons are made with strategy objectives to assess effectiveness. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Changes to implemented strategy are suggested as warranted to ensure outcomes are achieved. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information obtained during monitoring and review is suggested to develop new strategies based on accumulated knowledge and experience. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine the effectiveness of the environmental impact of current practices
|
|
Impact of existing waste management practices is noted against legislation, industry standards, and council and community requirements and expectations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Data contributing to cost-benefit analysis is collected on existing waste management practices. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The effects of existing waste practices on the environment are regularly monitored. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The waste impact cycle is monitored for components of waste stream in council area. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Resource usage in waste impact cycle is measured accurately. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor waste reduction targets
|
|
Targets for reducing impact of waste are monitored in accordance with community standards and relevant authority requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Performance is measured accurately, regularly and in a cost-effective manner. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Statistical comparisons are made between targets and performance to establish accurately if targets have been met. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contribute to the development of a waste impact reduction plan
|
|
Consultation with the community and relevant authorities and organisations is undertaken as directed to assist in developing targets and strategies to reduce waste impact. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria to prioritise strategies are suggested. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information to assist comparison with similar methods in practice elsewhere and assess effectiveness of strategies is contributed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate trial and sampling techniques are followed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Follow strategies to reduce waste impact
|
|
Strategic priorities are followed to provide the most effective resolution of issues within available resources. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes are monitored to ensure the strategy is achieving objectives and modifications are suggested as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Program time lines, schedules and targets are followed to enable strategy objectives to be met. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor effectiveness of strategies to reduce waste
|
|
Data is collected and analysed on a regular basis to provide accurate measures of performance. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Comparisons are made with strategy objectives to assess effectiveness. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Changes to implemented strategy are suggested as warranted to ensure outcomes are achieved. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information obtained during monitoring and review is suggested to develop new strategies based on accumulated knowledge and experience. Completed |
Evidence:
|