The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Identify existing and required levels of service
|
|
Customer expectations regarding levels of service balanced against cost are determined and reviewed using appropriate strategies. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Minimum levels of service and service targets are set and based on customer expectations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Financial, political, social and technical costs of failing to meet targets and minimum levels of service are identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Service targets are included in business strategies. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information on proposed types and levels of service is documented and is used to inform customers and council to assess performance against standards. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assess asset renewal/creation options and determine optimal option
|
|
Treatment options to overcome or defer identified failure modes are determined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Options for a new asset creation are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The cost of each option is determined taking into account total investment, life cycle costs, cash flow and project start/finish dates. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The benefits of each option are quantified in relation to improved levels of service, increased income, reduced risk cost and extension of effective life. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Whole-of-life cycle costs of the options under consideration are addressed in assessing the cost and benefit of each option. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The impact of each option on future maintenance and operations cost is identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The treatment option most suitable for business objectives and available resources is determined and included in forward works program. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prioritise works
|
|
Works are prioritised according to predetermined merit-based selection criteria. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The level of funding for each asset category is determined and works are rationalised to suit available budget. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Balance plans and service level agreements are used to balance resource allocation with management plan objectives. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review selection criteria
|
|
Merit-based selection criteria are determined and reviewed in consultation with customer to ensure the currency and relevance of each asset category. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Options for the review of selection criteria are presented to council as appropriate. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide information about works programs to customers
|
|
Customer requests for information are responded to promptly. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Customers are advised of priority status of work in question and the basis of the decision is explained clearly. Completed |
Evidence:
|