The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Obtain brief from clients
|
|
Job requirements are reviewed and clarified with appropriate persons in accordance with organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Discussions with customer/client are conducted to establish and clarify scope of work Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective interpersonal techniques are applied when interacting with clients Completed |
Evidence:
|
Specific site requirements are identified and details are correctly documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Architectural hardware requirements are discussed and applicable legislation, codes and national standards are clarified and agreed upon Completed |
Evidence:
|
Brief documents and architectural plans are arranged in accordance with organisational requirements or company policies Completed |
Evidence:
|
Gather, interpret and review information for preparation of hardware schedules
|
|
Site restrictions, regulations and requirements are identified and complied with in accordance with applicable legislation, codes and national standards, and organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is gathered from identified sources and is relevant to assignment requirements in accordance with applicable legislation, codes and national standards, client and organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
An assessment is carried out to identify door and frametypes and locations to facilitate the accurate determination of architectural hardware requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clients activities and existing architectural hardware arrangements are reviewed to ensure uniformity throughout project Completed |
Evidence:
|
Inconsistency andenvironmental factors affecting the architectural hardware of the site are identified and assessed in accordance with organisational policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Produce architectural door hardware schedules
|
|
Information is recorded and documented in accordance with computer program and/or organisational template requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Architectural hardware is integrated to reflect building security and electronic requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
An architectural hardware schedule is prepared in accordance with industry and organisational standards of style, format and accuracy Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommendations for architectural hardware and alternative options are made in accordance with organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Documentation is processed in accordance with applicable legislation, codes and national standards, assignment and organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
A comprehensive assessment of client architectural hardware requirements is completed within designated timeframes and presented for review to appropriate person Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare and review keying schedules
|
|
Principles of master keying are applied in accordance with industry practice and organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Keying matrix is developed to client requirements, allowing for future system expansion and mechanical capabilities of system Completed |
Evidence:
|
Client keying requirements are confirmed and clarified according to organisational procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate levels of security/access are reviewed with respect to clients assets, activities and existing security arrangements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is recorded and documented in accordance with computer program and/or organisational template requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clients requirements are matched to the mechanical possibilities and limitations of master key systems Completed |
Evidence:
|
Options are identified and client is advised on options and alternatives Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sources of assistance in assessing requirements for key systems and master key systems are identified and assistance is sought from appropriate person in accordance with organisational procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Finalise documentation for submission to client
|
|
Final architectural hardware and/or keying requirements are reviewed and confirmed with client in accordance with organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Documentation is accurately prepared and processed and stored in accordance with client, legislative and organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Architectural hardware and keying schedules and other documentation are prepared according to organisational procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|