The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish evaluation criteria for design
|
|
Applicable legislative, OHS and enterprise requirements relevant to the evaluation of design proposals and concepts are verified and complied with Completed |
Evidence:
|
Original design brief is analysed to establish criteria to use in assessing design proposals and concepts Completed |
Evidence:
|
Enterprise business objectives are reviewed to identify criteria to use in assessing designs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Enterprise production capacity is identified and strengths and limitations incorporated into evaluation criteria Completed |
Evidence:
|
Current industry design trends are researched and identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for assessment are identified and clarified with client and colleagues Completed |
Evidence:
|
The weighting of each criteria for assessment is confirmed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Details are recorded in accordance with enterprise practice Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate design
|
|
Design is assessed to evaluate if it fits the intention of the design brief Completed |
Evidence:
|
Form, function and style of the design are assessed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Environmental impact of the design is assessed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Cultural relevance of the design is analysed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Economic significance of the design is assessed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design methodology is reviewed for adherence to the elements and principles of design Completed |
Evidence:
|
Material choice appropriateness is analysed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Technical integrity of the design is assessed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate design concepts for construction and production suitability
|
|
Details of enterprise and related construction constraints are assessed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Details of enterprise and subcontractor production constraints are identified and reviewed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Production ability of the design is analysed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Equipment selection is assessed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manufacturing process, assembly and finishing techniques selected for the design are reviewed and evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design is evaluated against construction and production constraints Completed |
Evidence:
|
Changes to design are recommended and recorded in accordance with enterprise practice Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine and report on design suitability
|
|
Design is evaluated against each criteria Completed |
Evidence:
|
Weighted assessment is used to make comparisons and rank components of design Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommendations are made for improvements to design in order to further address criteria Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design suitability in meeting criteria is determined and documented with recommendations for improvements Completed |
Evidence:
|