The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Define the design objectives and detail
|
|
The purpose of the design is defined and/or clarified Completed |
Evidence:
|
The potential market for the design product is considered and defined Completed |
Evidence:
|
Intended production materials and outline production processes are identified and agreed as the basis for determination Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish the design assessment criteria
|
|
Criteria for the assessment of production material options are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for the assessment of product functionality are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for the assessment of production process options and impacts of these on overall business operations are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for the assessment of safety and potential liability issues are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for assessment of costs and marketability are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply the assessment criteria
|
|
The determination process, including personnel, information/input collection and recording, scoring or grading criteria and decision making processes are established and agreed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Products which are competitors/potential competitors in the market place are selected for comparative purposes Completed |
Evidence:
|
The design is scored/graded against agreed criteria and the results recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Competition products are scored/graded against the agreed criteria and the results recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assessment results are completed in accordance with the agreed process Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine feasibility and options
|
|
Assessment results of the design and competition products are analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designs which fail to satisfy assessment and provide no optional potential are rejected Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designs which fail to satisfy assessment but which have optional/alternative potential are referred to the appropriate party Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designs which satisfy potential are conditionally endorsed, with the conditions being recorded and passed to the appropriate party Completed |
Evidence:
|
Formal records of the determination are completed and processed in accordance with enterprise procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|