NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: MSACMT631A - Undertake value analysis of product costs in terms of customer requirements

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

MSACMT631A - Undertake value analysis of product costs in terms of customer requirements

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Analyse customer benefits and determine waste

  1. Determine features/benefits perceived by customer in product
  2. Analyse cost components and determine those which deliver customer features/benefits and those which don't
  3. Analyse waste cost components
  4. Determine alternative ways of reducing waste costs
  5. Select actions which maximise customer benefits and minimise costs
Determine features/benefits perceived by customer in product

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyse cost components and determine those which deliver customer features/benefits and those which don't

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyse waste cost components

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine alternative ways of reducing waste costs

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Select actions which maximise customer benefits and minimise costs

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyse production performance variance

  1. Analyse required performance to meet customer pull
  2. Determine actual cycle time/s and variability of cycle time
  3. Analyse cause of waste in throughput
  4. Analyse costs and determine methods of reducing costs/waste
  5. Take actions required to achieve cost/waste reduction/s
Analyse required performance to meet customer pull

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine actual cycle time/s and variability of cycle time

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyse cause of waste in throughput

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyse costs and determine methods of reducing costs/waste

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Take actions required to achieve cost/waste reduction/s

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, the range statement and the assessment guidelines for this training package.

Overview of assessment requirements

The employee will select a product/range of products to analyse and determine waste in terms of any cost which does not contribute directly to an identified customer benefit/feature and then proceed to determine and implement methods of reducing this waste.

What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?

Access to a workplace implementing competitive manufacturing strategies. No other specific resources are required.

In what context should assessment occur?

Assessment will need to occur in a workplace.

Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?

This unit may be assessed concurrently with appropriate units on continuous improvement/kaizen.

What method of assessment should apply?

Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.

Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.

The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.

The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.

What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?

Evidence should be available from a number of minor changes or from a single large change which had multiple facets and which was implemented over a period of months.

Required Skills and Knowledge

Required skills

calculation

communication

problem solving

analysis

numeracy

literacy

planning and organising

Required knowledge

customer benefits from products

performance and cycle times for products made

major costs which are controllable (and how to control them)

types of waste (muda)

methods of reducing waste (muda)

methods of reducing cycle time

desirability of improving performance and methods of reducing cycle time

Range Statement

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Waste

Waste (also known as muda in the Toyota Production System and its derivatives) is any activity which does not contribute to customer benefit/features in the product.

Within manufacturing, categories of waste include:

excess production and early production

delays

movement and transport

poor process design

inventory

inefficient performance of a process

making defective items.

Waste for this unit may include activities which do not yield any benefit to the organisation or any benefit to the organisations customers.

Performance

Performance may be thought of as the rate of output of the plant compared to the rate required to meet demand.

Cycle time

Cycle time is the normal time to complete an operation on a product.

Pull

Pull is the concept of producing to demand, rather than for stock or some forecast.