The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Verify the accuracy of data and technical records
|
|
Access relevant job instructions, data and technical records in laboratory information management system (LIMS) Completed |
Evidence:
|
Confirm that technical records provide sufficient information to ensure traceability for the tests involved Completed |
Evidence:
|
Compare data with expected values and identify any outliers Completed |
Evidence:
|
Inspect data records to check the integrity of data entry, alterations, transfers and calculations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Correct and initial any incorrect data records Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sign off data records as correct Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine if results are acceptable and within expectation
|
|
Compare results with expected values and identify any significant differences Completed |
Evidence:
|
Check the reliability of results by examining data or results from repeat tests or duplicate samples Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assess the significance of any documented observations of atypical test conditions or environment and/or sample appearance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Check that all calculations are free from error Completed |
Evidence:
|
Check that estimations of uncertainty are reasonable and consistent with the test method, client and/or product specification requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Authorise the issue of results that meet the organisation's quality standards and are consistent with expectations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Investigate unexpected or unacceptable results
|
|
Examine records of pre-use checks and calibration performance to ensure that the equipment and/or instruments used meet test specifications and enterprise requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish whether human and/or environmental factors could have affected the reliability of results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Check for obvious sources of interferences that may have occurred during measurements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Retrieve stored samples (if available) and assess whether they are atypical or contaminated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Perform control tests using the same, or new, samples to check unexpected results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Authorise the issue of unexpected results that meet the organisation's quality standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify possible root causes of unacceptable results and appropriate preventative/corrective actions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Report investigation outcomes and recommendations for improvements in accordance with enterprise procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Liaise with clients about results
|
|
Establish whether sampling procedures used by the client could contribute to unexpected/unacceptable results Completed |
Evidence:
|
Arrange for new samples and/or re-testing as necessary Completed |
Evidence:
|
Explain investigation outcomes and confidence level for unexpected test results Completed |
Evidence:
|