The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of the ability to:

critically examine existing operations and determine correlations to implementation of competitive systems and practices tools

supervise introduction of new tools or modification of the use of existing tools

integrate tools with the overall operations strategy and future state.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Assessment of performance must be undertaken in a workplace using or implementing one or more competitive systems and practices.

Access may be required to:

workplace procedures and plans relevant to work area

specifications and documentation relating to planned, currently being implemented, or implemented changes to work processes and procedures relevant to the assessee

documentation and information in relation to production, waste, overheads and hazard control/management

reports from supervisors/managers

case studies and scenarios to assess responses to contingencies.

Method of assessment

A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.

Competence in this unit may be assessed by using a combination of the following to generate evidence:

demonstration in the workplace

workplace projects

suitable simulation

case studies/scenarios (particularly for assessment of contingencies, improvement scenarios, and so on)

targeted questioning

reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues (third-party reports)

portfolio of evidence.

In all cases it is expected that practical assessment will be combined with targeted questioning to assess underpinning knowledge.

Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.

Guidance information for assessment

Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.

Required skills

Required skills include:

undertaking self-directed problem solving and decision making on issues of abroad and/or highly specialised nature and in highly varied and/or highly specialised contexts

communicating at all levels in the organisation and value stream and to audiences of different levels of literacy and numeracy

analysing current state/situation of the organisation and value stream

overseeing the setting of key performance indicators (KPIs) for future state

interpreting data and qualitative information gained from benchmarking

analysing individually and collectively the implementation of competitive systems and practices tools in the organisation and determining strategies for improved implementation

relating implementation and use of tools to customer benefit

solving highly varied and highly specialised problems related to competitive systems and practices implementation to root cause

negotiating with stakeholders, where required, to obtain information required for improvements, including management, unions, value stream members, employees and members of the community

analysing operational processes in the organisation and value stream and relating to competitive systems and practices tools

Required knowledge

Required knowledge includes:

competitive systems and practices at both a strategic and tools level, including advantages and limitations of:

value stream mapping

5S

Just in Time (JIT)

mistake proofing

process mapping

establishing customer pull

breakthrough improvement and continuous improvement (kaizen and kaizen blitz)

setting of KPIs/metrics

identification and elimination of waste (muda)

six sigma and lean six sigma

best practice in implementation of competitive systems and practices tools

customer benefit as used in competitive systems and practices

ways of determining competency gaps that may act as restrictions in achieving best practice in operations

define, measure, analyse, improve and control (DMAIC) process applied to competitive systems and practices tool use

organisation desired future state in both quantitative and qualitative terms

how to measure progress towards desired future state

formal problem solving tools, including root cause analysis (RCA)

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Competitive systems and practices

Competitive systems and practices may include, but are not limited to:

lean operations

agile operations

preventative and predictive maintenance approaches

monitoring and data gathering systems, such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Materials Resource Planning (MRP) and proprietary systems

statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma

JIT, kanban and other pull-related operations control systems

supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis

5S

continuous improvement (kaizen)

breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz)

cause/effect diagrams

overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)

takt time

process mapping

problem solving

run charts

standard procedures

current reality tree

Competitive systems and practices should be interpreted so as to take into account:

the stage of implementation of competitive systems and practices

the size of the enterprise

the work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and the industry sector

Future state

Future state may include:

process reliability

waste

health, safety and environment (HSE)

maintenance

systems

Codes of practice/standards

Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used

HSE

All changes implemented are expected to be at least neutral, or preferably beneficial, in their impact on HSE

Organisation

Organisation includes:

any part of a operations or service organisation

companies, government bodies or other body of people aiming to produce a product to service a customer

Desired future state

Desired future state refers to:

the agreed position of where the organisation wants to be as measured by performance indicators

Progress not to plan

Progress not to plan includes:

both progress which falls short of plan and which exceeds plan

Improvements

Improvements include:

the use of different or additional tools

the application of the current tools in use in a different way

a change of emphasis from ‘tools’ to an accepted part of the organisation’s culture

Manager

Manager may include:

any person who may have either a permanent or an ad hoc role in facilitating the function of multiple teams in a workplace, departments or entire organisations