The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Provide ethical leadership
|
|
Ethical conduct is modelled, and reinforced in others Completed |
Evidence:
|
The professionalism required of public servants is communicated and encouraged in ways suited to the diversity of the workforce Completed |
Evidence:
|
Staff are encouraged to raise ethical dilemmas, are provided with frameworks for ethical decision making and policy setting, and coached in their application Completed |
Evidence:
|
Staff are provided with opportunities to develop skills in identifying and resolving situations requiring ethical judgment Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clarification of the ethical aspects of decisions/actions and advice and guidance on more complex ethical problems are provided promptly and documented in accordance with organisational policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
The reporting of suspected unethical conduct is encouraged, dealt with in a confidential manner and acted on promptly, and in accordance with policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
The work environment is monitored and policies/organisational procedures are evaluated for consistency with public sector standards, and changes are recommended where necessary Completed |
Evidence:
|
Balance competing public interests
|
|
Consideration of relevant facts is undertaken comprehensively, and weightings given to competing interests are unbiased, transparent and defensible Completed |
Evidence:
|
Decision making processes are used transparently, and accountably and reasoning/grounds for decisions are documented in accordance with policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objective and impartial advice is provided to government regarding policy decisions relating to the public interest Completed |
Evidence:
|
Where staff indicate conflicts of interest, action is taken immediately to resolve the situation in accordance with policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish and monitor processes and practices that encourage integrity
|
|
Organisational processes and practices are developed or reviewed to ensure they meet the requirements of procedural fairness and accountability Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes are developed containing mechanisms to ensure that public resources are used in accordance with public sector ethics standards, legislation, policy and/or guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk management strategies are included in processes and meet client, staff and organisational needs for transparency and accountability Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes and practices are monitored to ensure they encourage and support those reporting unethical conduct and protect them from reprisals Completed |
Evidence:
|
Action is taken to ensure that the ethical standard of conduct of contractors is consistent with the requirements of the contracting organisation Completed |
Evidence:
|