The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Prepare for fraud and corruption control awareness presentation
|
|
Objectives are developed for the presentation that reflect the identified needs of the participants, are achievable and stated in terms of outcomes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Presentation methods are selected to suit identified outcomes, participants' needs and availability of equipment and resources. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provision is made for participants to contribute to the session based on their experience. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Content of materials to be used is validated by experience before use, where possible. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Examples of incidents and results of non-compliance are included in presentation materials. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Examples of successful cooperative arrangements are included in presentation materials. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Presentation methods and information are structured to suit the specified objectives of the session, the needs of the participants and the size and location of the group. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Deliver session on fraud and corruption awareness
|
|
Session is structured to facilitate the creation of opportunities for discussion of broad conceptual, ethical and legal issues surrounding fraud and corruption control. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives of the session, structure of the activities and other details are explained to participants to suit their level of understanding and experience, and feedback elicited. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Materials and presentation techniques used are adapted to the particular audience and are effective and interesting. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Materials are presented in such a way as to establish a positive response in the organisation and its clients regarding fraud and corruption control. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Case studies are used for illustrative purposes, where possible. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Models of excellence of fraud and corruption control in the public and private sectors are highlighted. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review fraud and corruption control awareness session outcomes
|
|
Participants are encouraged to provide feedback on all aspects of the awareness sessions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Suitability of the approach, the content and outcomes are reviewed as a guide for further activities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Own performance is reviewed against objectives and in response to participants' responses and comments. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advice is provided to appropriate people regarding possible future activities or amendments to organisational awareness strategy and programs, including identification of high risk areas for fraud and corruption activities. Completed |
Evidence:
|