The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Hypothesise fraud and corruption situations
|
|
Formulate hypotheses and specify guidelines for input into information system design. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Collect data and information from a variety of sources and methods. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Use hypothetical fraud and corruption situations to identify new potential risk areas. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Initiate projects to test newly identified risk areas
|
|
Initiate new projects and define parameters in accordance with fraud/corruption control plan. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Justify significance and value of the project and ensure consistency with fraud/corruption control plan and strategy. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review previous and ongoing activities in the relevant areas for their contributions to the outcomes of the project. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design project activities utilising current knowledge, methods and techniques for the identification of risks. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations
|
|
Review project and investigation outcomes to identify emerging patterns of behaviour reflected in data. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Draw conclusions from data and statistical information as well as qualitative sources including information gathered and reports from previous investigations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify risks and strengths as a result of a project’s analysis of trends inside and outside the organisation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Include discussion with colleagues and other experienced organisational staff as an additional source of information on trends. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Use networks to provide useful contacts and information for investigation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Produce performance reports that identify trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommend course/s of action
|
|
Consider relevant elements during evaluation, prior to recommending course of action. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify investigation targets, and refer suggestions for future areas of investigation to management. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommend changes to organisational controls and initiatives to target potential trouble spots. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Check reliability of data. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Make practical recommendations providing management with feasible options, balancing management issues and concerns against public interest and political concerns and operational demands against contributions to strategic plan. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide information on recommended actions
|
|
Provide reports containing suggestions for actions and sufficient supporting information for management to resource future projects. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide advice regarding appropriate controls and initiatives required to address fraud and corruption. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare and give operational briefings and other presentations, as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Take advantage of ad hoc opportunities to explain operational risks as they arise. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Give information in terms that clearly explain the nature of possible risk, with possible solutions outlined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Hypothesise fraud and corruption situations
|
|
Formulate hypotheses and specify guidelines for input into information system design. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Collect data and information from a variety of sources and methods. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Use hypothetical fraud and corruption situations to identify new potential risk areas. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Initiate projects to test newly identified risk areas
|
|
Initiate new projects and define parameters in accordance with fraud/corruption control plan. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Justify significance and value of the project and ensure consistency with fraud/corruption control plan and strategy. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review previous and ongoing activities in the relevant areas for their contributions to the outcomes of the project. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design project activities utilising current knowledge, methods and techniques for the identification of risks. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations
|
|
Review project and investigation outcomes to identify emerging patterns of behaviour reflected in data. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Draw conclusions from data and statistical information as well as qualitative sources including information gathered and reports from previous investigations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify risks and strengths as a result of a project’s analysis of trends inside and outside the organisation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Include discussion with colleagues and other experienced organisational staff as an additional source of information on trends. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Use networks to provide useful contacts and information for investigation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Produce performance reports that identify trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommend course/s of action
|
|
Consider relevant elements during evaluation, prior to recommending course of action. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify investigation targets, and refer suggestions for future areas of investigation to management. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommend changes to organisational controls and initiatives to target potential trouble spots. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Check reliability of data. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Make practical recommendations providing management with feasible options, balancing management issues and concerns against public interest and political concerns and operational demands against contributions to strategic plan. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide information on recommended actions
|
|
Provide reports containing suggestions for actions and sufficient supporting information for management to resource future projects. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide advice regarding appropriate controls and initiatives required to address fraud and corruption. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare and give operational briefings and other presentations, as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Take advantage of ad hoc opportunities to explain operational risks as they arise. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Give information in terms that clearly explain the nature of possible risk, with possible solutions outlined. Completed |
Evidence:
|