NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: PSPGOV509A - Conduct evaluations

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

PSPGOV509A - Conduct evaluations

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Identify the purpose of the evaluation

  1. The purpose, scope and terms of reference of the evaluation are confirmed with key stakeholders and approvals are gained in accordance with organisational requirement
  2. The range of documentary evidence, individuals and organisations who can provide specialist input are identified and commitment is gained for their contribution to the evaluation
  3. Information critical to the evaluation is determined to inform the selection of the evaluation methodology and tools
  4. Ownership of the evaluation data/outcomes and right of access to the reported results are determined in accordance with organisational policy and procedures
The purpose, scope and terms of reference of the evaluation are confirmed with key stakeholders and approvals are gained in accordance with organisational requirement

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The range of documentary evidence, individuals and organisations who can provide specialist input are identified and commitment is gained for their contribution to the evaluation

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information critical to the evaluation is determined to inform the selection of the evaluation methodology and tools

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ownership of the evaluation data/outcomes and right of access to the reported results are determined in accordance with organisational policy and procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify evaluation methodology and tools

  1. Criteria for the evaluation and the audience for evaluation results are identified and communicated to stakeholders
  2. Evaluation methods are selected from a range of alternatives to suit the scope, purpose and outcome requirements of the evaluation
  3. Measuring tools and media are selected/developed to ensure valid and reliable evaluation results
  4. An evaluation strategy is formulated in consultation with key stakeholders to ensure acceptance and commitment
  5. Resource needs are determined in accordance with budgetary constraints and obtained in accordance with organisational policy and procedures
  6. Evaluation infrastructure is established in accordance with evaluation requirements and resource constraints
Criteria for the evaluation and the audience for evaluation results are identified and communicated to stakeholders

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation methods are selected from a range of alternatives to suit the scope, purpose and outcome requirements of the evaluation

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measuring tools and media are selected/developed to ensure valid and reliable evaluation results

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An evaluation strategy is formulated in consultation with key stakeholders to ensure acceptance and commitment

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resource needs are determined in accordance with budgetary constraints and obtained in accordance with organisational policy and procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation infrastructure is established in accordance with evaluation requirements and resource constraints

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implement evaluation

  1. Implementation tasks are defined and clarified with stakeholders in accordance with the evaluation methodology
  2. Evaluation strategy is implemented and data collected, collated and recorded against evaluation criteria in accordance with planned methodology
  3. Expectations are managed and barriers to the evaluation are identified and addressed or referred in accordance with organisational policy and procedures
  4. Progress of the evaluation is monitored and changes are negotiated as needed to timeframes, methodology or tools in accordance with organisational policy and procedures
  5. Data is analysed/referred for specialist analysis, and results are compared with evaluation criteria
  6. Preliminary results are presented for stakeholder feedback in accordance with organisational policy and procedures
  7. The evaluation is conducted in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements
Implementation tasks are defined and clarified with stakeholders in accordance with the evaluation methodology

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation strategy is implemented and data collected, collated and recorded against evaluation criteria in accordance with planned methodology

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expectations are managed and barriers to the evaluation are identified and addressed or referred in accordance with organisational policy and procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Progress of the evaluation is monitored and changes are negotiated as needed to timeframes, methodology or tools in accordance with organisational policy and procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data is analysed/referred for specialist analysis, and results are compared with evaluation criteria

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preliminary results are presented for stakeholder feedback in accordance with organisational policy and procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The evaluation is conducted in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report outcomes

  1. An evaluation report is prepared that compares outcomes to the evaluation criteria established at the outset, and provides supporting evidence in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements
  2. Recommendations for action are made in accordance with the terms of reference and supported by the evaluation outcomes
  3. Unbiased and objective evaluation outcomes are reported in a form and language to suit the intended audience of the report
An evaluation report is prepared that compares outcomes to the evaluation criteria established at the outset, and provides supporting evidence in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendations for action are made in accordance with the terms of reference and supported by the evaluation outcomes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unbiased and objective evaluation outcomes are reported in a form and language to suit the intended audience of the report

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.

Units to be assessed together

Pre-requisite unitsthat must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil

Co-requisite unitsthat must be assessed with this unit:Nil

Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:

PSPETHC501B Promote the values and ethos of public service

PSPFIN501A Apply public sector financial policies and processes

PSPGOV502B Develop client services

PSPGOV503B Coordinate resource allocation and usage

PSPGOV504B Undertake research and analysis

PSPGOV505A Promote diversity

PSPGOV507A Undertake negotiations

PSPGOV508A Manage conflict

PSPGOV511A Provide leadership

PSPGOV512A Use complex workplace communication strategies

PSPLEGN501B Promote compliance with legislation in the public sector

PSPPM502B Manage complex projects

PSPPOL501A Develop organisation policy

PSPPROC504A Finalise contracts

Overview of evidence requirements

In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:

the knowledge requirements of this unit

the skill requirements of this unit

application of Employability Skills as they relate to this unit

conduct of a range of (3 or more) evaluations in different contexts

Resources required to carry out assessment

These resources include:

legislation, policies, procedures and protocols

access to an evaluation target

case studies and workplace scenarios

Where and how to assess evidence

Valid assessment of this unit requires:

a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when conducting evaluations, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine

conduct of a range of (3 or more) evaluations in different contexts

Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:

people with disabilities

people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

women

young people

older people

people in rural and remote locations.

Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:

case studies

portfolios

projects

questioning

scenarios

authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses

For consistency of assessment

Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments

Required Skills and Knowledge

This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Skill requirements

Look for evidence that confirms skills in:

implementing planning, research and analysis

using negotiation and problem solving

undertaking project management

applying statistical analysis of evaluation data

using a range of communication styles to communicate with different audiences and purposes

responding to diversity, including gender and disability

explaining complex and formal documents such as legislation and codes of conduct and applying them to work practices

developing objectives and evaluation criteria

accessing legislation and codes of conduct electronically or in hard copy

Knowledge requirements

Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:

evaluation principles - time, cost, quality, quantity, efficiency

qualitative and quantitative evaluation methodologies and data analysis

reporting requirements of a range of audiences

legislation, policy and procedures relating to the conduct of evaluations in the public sector

public sector values and codes of conduct

equal employment opportunity, equity and diversity principles

Range Statement

The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here.

Purpose of evaluation may include

measuring merit/quality

measuring worth or value for a particular purpose

measuring results, outputs or outcomes

decision making

unintentional negatives

Scope may include evaluation of

planning

delivery

results

needs

objectives

design

processes

inputs

outputs

outcomes

impact

Stakeholders may include

all those individuals and groups both inside and outside the organisation that have some direct interest in the organisation's behaviour, actions, products and services such as:

the owner/organisation that commissioned the evaluation

those subject to the evaluation process

research staff who conduct evaluation

contractors/consultants contracted to conduct evaluation

employees at all levels of the organisation

community

clients

other public sector organisations

private sector

non-government organisations

union and association representatives

boards of management

government

Ministers

Criteria for evaluation may include

whether objectives have been met

standards against which to compare quality

baseline studies for comparison

performance measures

key success areas

key performance indicators

results/outputs/outcomes

value for money

public interest

Evaluation methods may be

qualitative

quantitative

anonymous

Measuring tools may include

surveys

interviews

questionnaires

focus groups

semi-structured interview techniques

document analysis

process analysis

observation

tests

Media for measuring tools may include

paper-based

Internet-based

email

electronic

face-to-face

telephone.

Evaluation infrastructure may include

steering committee

manager

internal/external research staff

internal/external administrative staff

office

telephone

technology

email

web site

equipment

consumables

resources including budget

internal/external specialist or technical support

contractors

consultants

Research staff may include

in-house staff

contractors

consultants

Presentation of information may include

interim reports

progress reports

draft reports

executive summaries

to meetings, groups, seminars

Internet or email

Legislative and organisational requirements may include

Commonwealth and State/Territory legislation including equal employment opportunity and anti-discrimination law, for example:

Commonwealth Racial Discrimination Act

Commonwealth Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act

Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Act

Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act.

national and international codes of practice and standards

the organisation's policies and practices

government policy

codes of conduct

confidentiality

privacy

ethical practices and procedures

intellectual property

copyright

Recommendations for action may include

new goals

improvement strategies

changes to services, products

governance strategies

change management strategies

termination

replacement