NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: PUAEMR029 - Plan and implement a treatment measure

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

PUAEMR029 - Plan and implement a treatment measure

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Develop treatment plan

  1. Risk(s) to be treated and current relevance of treatment option(s) confirmed.
  2. Key stakeholders are identified along with their potential interests, sensitivities, roles and responsibilities
  3. Performance criteria for assessing the effectiveness of treatment implementation are established in consultation with stakeholders.
  4. Treatment actions, resources required, milestones, budget, reporting procedures and roles and responsibilities of project team members are identified.
  5. Implementation issues are identified and contingencies developed where necessary.
  6. An agreed treatment plan is documented and submitted for approval in accordance with organisational policies and procedures.
Risk(s) to be treated and current relevance of treatment option(s) confirmed.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key stakeholders are identified along with their potential interests, sensitivities, roles and responsibilities

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance criteria for assessing the effectiveness of treatment implementation are established in consultation with stakeholders.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment actions, resources required, milestones, budget, reporting procedures and roles and responsibilities of project team members are identified.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implementation issues are identified and contingencies developed where necessary.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An agreed treatment plan is documented and submitted for approval in accordance with organisational policies and procedures.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implement and monitor treatment plan

  1. Team roles and responsibilities are allocated and communication and reporting procedures are confirmed.
  2. Consultation and communication strategies, treatment activities and adequacy of resources are monitored and reported.
  3. Variations to the treatment plan are agreed with supervisor/manager and documented.
  4. Accurate records of meetings and communications with stakeholders and project team members are maintained
  5. Treatment activities are completed efficiently.
Team roles and responsibilities are allocated and communication and reporting procedures are confirmed.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consultation and communication strategies, treatment activities and adequacy of resources are monitored and reported.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variations to the treatment plan are agreed with supervisor/manager and documented.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accurate records of meetings and communications with stakeholders and project team members are maintained

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment activities are completed efficiently.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review the process and treatment implementation

  1. Effectiveness of treatment implementation is assessed using agreed performance criteria and stakeholder input.
  2. Planning processes are reviewed to identify opportunities for improvements.
  3. All project reporting requirements are completed.
Effectiveness of treatment implementation is assessed using agreed performance criteria and stakeholder input.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planning processes are reviewed to identify opportunities for improvements.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All project reporting requirements are completed.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:
Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Assessment must confirm the ability to:

evaluate the treatment measure

develop an effective implementation plan in cooperation with the stakeholders and gain organisational approval for it

identify implementation issues and develop/document contingencies

work with stakeholders to monitor treatment implementation

maintain momentum and achieve the project outcomes within available resources

establish, conduct and finalise a treatment project that has broad stakeholder and organisational support and produces effective treatment outcomes

Consistency in performance

Competency should be demonstrated in at least two different contexts throughout the life of a treatment project, or during components of a number of projects, one of which may be simulated.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Context of assessment

Competency should be assessed planning and implementing an agreed treatment measure in the workplace or in a simulated workplace environment.

Specific resources for assessment

For the demonstration of competence in this unit it will be necessary to participate in a real-world project.

Underpinning knowledge may be assessed through written assignments, project reports, debriefings and action learning projects in real or simulated environments.

Guidance information for assessment

This unit contains many transferable skills, such as communication, consultation, research and analysis skills that can be applied in the emergency risk management context.

Assessors should use formative assessment strategies in a simulated environment to contextualise underpinning knowledge. Summative assessment requires application of the unit in a real-world project, often in an action-learning context.

This unit may be assessed with other units that address project management or other parts of the emergency risk management process.

Required Skills and Knowledge

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Required Skills

analyse effectiveness of treatment implementation

analyse positions of stakeholders, priorities of agencies and individuals

define and solve problems

demonstrate effective interpersonal interactions

interpret and follow applicable organisational policy and procedures

listen actively

locate and interpret community information

manage projects

maximise the participation of team members and input of stakeholders

monitor and enhance team work

resolve conflicts between participants constructively

summarise and explain key information clearly

value diversity of views and perceptions of risks

Required Knowledge

culture, diversity and history of communities, environments and associated concerns, issues and sensitivities, perception of risks

culture, structure and responsibility for treatments of key response/recovery agencies and organisations

decision-making techniques

jurisdictional, organisational and operational responsibilities for implementing risk treatment options

legislative and regulatory requirements relevant to implementing risk treatments

meeting procedures

organisational requirements for the submission and approval of treatment plans and reporting of treatment outcomes

project management techniques

planning process and the kinds of outcomes and benefits for communities

team work principles and strategies

tools for assessing treatment options

Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Stakeholders may include:

staff

client groups

decision makers

members of the public

community groups

industry groups

public and private sector organisations

non-government organisations

elected officials

Performance criteria for assessing the effectiveness of treatment implementation may include:

benefits of outcomes compared with costs of treatments

benefits to individuals, enterprises, communities, the environment, governments and their agencies

improved resilience of community/organisation through improved systems

reduction of vulnerability

Records may include:

lists of potential costs, invoice and payment records

log books, diaries, schedules, charts

minutes of meetings

project/organisational files and records

reports to stakeholders and management

risk management plans