The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish the framework for determining the tariff classification of goods
|
|
Role and purpose of the World Customs Organization (WCO) Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System is explained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Structure and purpose of the Customs Tariff Act is reviewed and explained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Structure and content of Customs Tariff Act Schedules and their application are analysed and used to guide classification practices Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare to determine tariff classification of goods
|
|
Resources and documentation required to classify goods are determined and obtained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Customs Tariff Act Schedule 2 is explained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Customs Tariff Act Schedule 3, and section and chapter notes are explained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Dash system for classifying goods is explained and applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interpretive rules (IRs) are examined in relation to their critical role in determining the correct headings and sub-headings Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effect of section and chapter notes on the use of headings in Schedule 3 is explained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply identification principles to goods
|
|
Illustrative descriptive material (IDM) and other supporting information is obtained as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Goods are identified in accordance with classification principles Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alternative classifications are identified as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Section and chapter notes are reviewed and applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Existing tariff classification precedents that apply to goods are determined and are applied as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Principles of statutory construction in the context of particular tariff headings and words are applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Select and justify headings
|
|
Headings are interpreted in hierarchical order Completed |
Evidence:
|
Comparison and rejection of headings are justified by reference to principles of statutory construction, the IRs and legal notes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Classification at heading level is determined in accordance with the IRs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Locate and justify sub-headings
|
|
Sub-heading notes are interpreted in accordance withthe IRs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Client and other resources are consulted to obtain further details of characteristics of goods to be classified, as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Preliminary classification of goods at both heading and sub-heading levels is made Completed |
Evidence:
|
Correct statistical code is identified and applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Complete post classification requirements
|
|
Preliminary classification is checked with manager, supervisor or more senior personnel prior to customs import declaration being lodged, as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Completed documentation is retained by relevant personnel in accordance with customs requirements and related legislative requirements, and workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre- or post-classification potential areas of dispute are anticipated and discussed and action to clarify decisions is taken in accordance with workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tariff advice request is prepared as required, in response to identified problems Completed |
Evidence:
|