Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver AHCCCF501, 'Evaluate project submissions'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Reference books for 'Evaluate project submissions' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
Elements describe the essential outcomes.
Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.
1. Review previously planned project outcomes
1.1 Identify updates to proposed project outcomes and evaluation processes
1.2 Conduct consultations with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation
1.3 Identify availability of data and suitable range of methods to evaluate project progress
2. Develop evaluation approach for project submissions
2.1 Develop criteria for evaluation of project applications or submissions
2.2 Develop decision making process for evaluating and accepting or rejecting project submissions
2.3 Consult with stakeholders on proposed criteria and decision making process
2.4 Review process based on stakeholder feedback and organisational requirements
2.5 Develop review panel for evaluation of project submissions
2.6 Communicate decision making process and selection criteria to review panel, project applicants and other key stakeholders
3. Evaluate project submissions
3.1 Acknowledge receipt of all project submissions
3.2 Use agreed processes and criteria to evaluate project submissions
3.3 Review decisions with other panellists to determine outcomes
4. Communicate decisions
4.1 Communicate decisions of panel to project applicants
4.2 Provide feedback on submissions and reasons for decisions
4.3 Publish outcomes according to organisational policies and procedures
5. Report on and implement conclusions
5.1 Prepare report to program, agency and project requirements
5.2 Check analysis and report conclusions with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included
5.3 Ensure report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process
5.4 Ensure data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements
5.5 Submit report according to project, program and agency requirements
5.6 Implement report conclusions to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority