Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver AVIF0005, 'Implement aviation fatigue risk management processes'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Implement aviation fatigue risk management processes' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENTS | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA | ||
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. | ||
1 | Identify fatigue hazards and assess risk | 1.1 | Fatigue hazards are identified through organisational methods in accordance with workplace standards |
1.2 | Stakeholders are identified and involved in the risk assessment process | ||
1.3 | Likelihood and consequence of fatigue hazards are assessed and ranked against established organisational risk assessment criteria | ||
2 | Identify fatigue risk controls | 2.1 | Controls that reduce fatigue risk to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) are identified in accordance with workplace policies and procedures |
2.2 | Fatigue risk management documentation is completed and checked for accuracy | ||
2.3 | Fatigue risk management action plan is developed and communicated to all stakeholders | ||
3 | Control fatigue risk | 3.1 | Control selection is determined with consideration of effect on stakeholders |
3.2 | Fatigue risk control methods are communicated to stakeholders | ||
3.3 | Selected control method is implemented, monitored and evaluated | ||
4 | Monitor and review effectiveness of fatigue risk control | 4.1 | Implemented risk controls are regularly monitored against measures of success/effectiveness |
4.2 | Assistance is provided to review fatigue risk in own area of operation | ||
4.3 | Management of fatigue risk is continuously monitored and reviewed in own area of operation | ||
4.4 | Review results are used to improve fatigue risk control | ||